[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1183?page=comments#action_12370793
]
Anthony Hong commented on MYFACES-1183:
---
sample of sorting/paginating of MyFaces have this issue
Configurations /WEB-INF/faces-config.xml loaded twice
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1176?page=comments#action_12370801
]
Volker Weber commented on MYFACES-1176:
---
Have you looked into tomahawks radio tag in combination with t:selectOneRadio
layout=spread .. ?
see :
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-116?page=all ]
updated TOMAHAWK-116:
--
TreeTable doesn't work properly while updating data
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-116
URL:
On 3/17/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following page has been changed by Dennis Byrne:
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Top_10_Questions
Hey Dennis.
Why a new page? Why not add them to the FAQ Wiki page?
I don't see any advantage to having two FAQs
-Mike
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1184?page=all ]
Chris Paulson-Ellis updated MYFACES-1184:
-
caption facet in tables
---
Key: MYFACES-1184
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1184
As I'm trying to work through the setup of the current MyFaces
snapshot under Eclipse (the maven eclipse wiki pages are once again
wrong, unfortunately), I am noticing that there are dependences in
tomahawk/src/test on the MyFaces impl.
org.apache.myfaces.custom.date.HtmlDateRendererTest.java:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-568?page=comments#action_12370838
]
Dirk Laube commented on MYFACES-568:
Even with the patch by Mathias there's on small issue left; consider this tree:
Node A contains node B, which contains node C. Then
Man, I must have looked right past that. I move the new info over later today.
Thanks.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 09:54 AM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: [Myfaces Wiki] Update of Top 10
Most/all of the dependencies you are talking about could be removed with Shale
as well, but where is the harm in impl dependecies on tomahawk *test* ? I
realize they *unit* tests but I would like to see the tests use as many
production myfaces classes as possible, w/out a container. This way
On 3/17/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most/all of the dependencies you are talking about could be removed with
Shale as well, but where is the harm in impl dependecies on tomahawk *test* ?
I realize they *unit* tests but I would like to see the tests use as many
production
One -- you're actually limiting or biasing the test coverage for this
particular test because you're testing against a particular
implementation rather than a more abstract mock object.
Yes, this is an argument that is as old as QA itself ;)
Two -- by requiring impl to be a dependency for the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-153?page=comments#action_12370854
]
Jorge RodrÃguez Pedrianes commented on TOMAHAWK-153:
Hello David, i see your question but think that you are one error in your jsp,
because if you put
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1174?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger closed MYFACES-1174:
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
I don't see this issue on either the javax.faces.convert.DateTimeConverter or
the sandbox version.
Both work
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1183?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger closed MYFACES-1183:
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
As far as I can tell, none of the Myfaces examples have ever listed
/WEB-INF/faces-config.xml in the web.xml
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1173?page=all ]
Dennis Byrne closed MYFACES-1173:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for your patience Wendy.
Change the groupId for Shale Test Framework
---
15 matches
Mail list logo