[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-469) Enter key in inputSuggestAjax submits form

Enter key in inputSuggestAjax submits form -- Key: TOMAHAWK-469 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-469 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Components: InputSuggestAjax Reporter: Peter Mahoney Fix

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Can we look at TOMAHAWK-458 and close the door on this release? Sean On 6/2/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I verified that two of the issues are also present in the 1.1.2 release so I don't consider these showstoppers. Anyone disagree? That leaves one last bug. TOMAHAWK-458.

Re: Nightly build of 1.2

I will try to add this to continuum later today. I also need to add Catalin's new examples and source stuff. Sean On 6/4/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You read my mind ( already committed ) :) - Thanks Wendy! Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Bruno Aranda

Re: svn commit: r411228 - /myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/application/ApplicationImpl.java

Again: I wouldn't duplicate anything that Stan has been doing. Sean, why do you keep reiterating this? Well I was under the impression that Stan had done most of JSF 1.2 but that he couldn't back out the TC 5.5 portion because it was all tangled. You are talking of things here you haven't

Re: svn commit: r411405 - /myfaces/core/branches/jsf12/api/pom.xml

This clazzes (deps to org.apache.myfaces.***) have been introduced by Stan. (by accident) I think dennis fixed it already. -Matthias On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also noticed the compiler choking while building the api. It needed classes in jsf12/impl . To hack

Re: svn commit: r411405 - /myfaces/core/branches/jsf12/api/pom.xml

I took care of this, there is no dep on impl anymore. Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:32 AM To: 'MyFaces Development' Subject: Re: svn commit: r411405 - /myfaces/core/branches/jsf12/api/pom.xml I also noticed

Re: svn commit: r411405 - /myfaces/core/branches/jsf12/api/pom.xml

:-) On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I took care of this, there is no dep on impl anymore. Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:32 AM To: 'MyFaces Development' Subject: Re: svn commit: r411405 -

Enabling Client Side Validation

Hi,I want to introduce the idea that I've come up with when I was working on the integration of the client side validation support for myFaces. Martin and I agreed this is the optimal solution for the problem for now. The aim is to minimize the effort of the myfaces user and do not break anything

Re: Enabling Client Side Validation

Seems like a good, clean approach. I say go ahead, as it will not break anything as the user has to specify the ENABLE_CLIENT_VALIDATION parameter. Good innovation !On 6/5/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,I want to introduce the idea that I've come up with when I was working on the

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-470) Add ability to set initial state of all details as expanded for master/detail table

Add ability to set initial state of all details as expanded for master/detail table Key: TOMAHAWK-470 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-470 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk

Re: svn commit: r411228 - /myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/application/ApplicationImpl.java

Hi, I've rethought about the whole thing, and as Matze and Dennis have already started working on the branch (and there is obviously enough momentum to go for 1.2 immediately), I'm ok with the other route now. I'll work with them on 1.2 - whatever we have there, and think about implementing the

Re: svn commit: r411228 - /myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/application/ApplicationImpl.java

Lets keep 1.2 on the branch for now. As someone pointed out a while ago its not really that important in SVN where the code is. You can merge either direction at any time. The concept of trunk and branch just helps us think about it easier. You guys are starting to get some momentum going

Re: svn commit: r411228 - /myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/application/ApplicationImpl.java

Hi Sean, ok, we can do that. Ultimately it should be just as easy to build 1.1 and 1.2. your second suggestion - using current_1_2 flows good for me. regards, Martin On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lets keep 1.2 on the branch for now. As someone pointed out a while ago

Re: svn commit: r411228 - /myfaces/core/trunk/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/application/ApplicationImpl.java

+1 on a second external and not *changing* current now. -Matthias On 6/5/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Sean, ok, we can do that. Ultimately it should be just as easy to build 1.1 and 1.2. your second suggestion - using current_1_2 flows good for me. regards, Martin On

Re: Enabling Client Side Validation

Cagatay, sounds very cool! Please use some org.apache.myfaces... namespace in front of ENABLE_CLIENT_SIDE_VALIDATION -Matthias On 6/5/06, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Seems like a good, clean approach. I say go ahead, as it will not break anything as the user has to specify the

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

I just placed tomahawk 1.1.3 in with core 1.1.3 . I found that each formless commandLink threw an exception. I have not been following the tomahawk stuff as closely as I should - I take it this was done in order to increase inter-operability? If this is the plan, I think there are going to

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

I just placed tomahawk 1.1.3 in with core 1.1.3 . I found that each formless commandLink threw an exception. I have not been following the tomahawk stuff as closely as I should - I take it this was done in order to increase inter-operability? Yes disallowing formless command link is

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

No problem. Can you add this code now? If you can't do svn commit just send your patch to this thread and someone will apply it to the branch. No problem, but I will not be able to do this for about 10 hours. I know you guys wanted to get this out the door soon, so just release if you want.

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

We'll wait. We've waited this long and anything that will reduce confusion is probably worth while. Sean On 6/5/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No problem. Can you add this code now? If you can't do svn commit just send your patch to this thread and someone will apply it to the

Re: Nightly build of 1.2

On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I have the 1.2 core setup in Continuum. The mail notification is still offline if someone wants to address this. (Ask Wendy, she knows the details.) This is about all I know: http://soulfood.dk/archives/2006/04/15/T00_22_41/index.html

Re: Nightly build of 1.2

@Grant: Any time to look at this? Sean On 6/5/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/5/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I have the 1.2 core setup in Continuum. The mail notification is still offline if someone wants to address this. (Ask Wendy, she knows the details.)

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

Sean- TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me... I can't reproduce. May be I did something wrong during my last testing. For tomahawk 1.1.2 release I also tested against RI and the scroller worked there for me. I go ahead and close this issue. -Matthias On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JSF 1.2] question

Hi, does anybody know why the methods added to ViewHandler or ExternalContext in 1.2 are not abstract, like their *old* JSF 1.1 counterparts ? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release. Thanks for the help. You are a MyFaces animal these days. Glad to have you back on full time! Sean On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sean- TOMAHAWK-458 works now for me... I can't reproduce. May be I

[ANNOUNCE] Nightly Sandbox Builds Available

Due to popular demand, the sandbox core is now available in the nightly builds directory[1]. Both source and binary distributions are available. We also hope to have an examples distribution for sandbox shortly. The MyFaces Team [1] http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-471) Serialization error with scheduler example

Serialization error with scheduler example -- Key: TOMAHAWK-471 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-471 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Components: Schedule Versions: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT

Re: [JSF 1.2] question

Backwards compatibility - at least of a sort; you won't get AbstractMethodErrors when using 1.1-compiled subclasses. -- Adam On 6/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, does anybody know why the methods added to ViewHandler or ExternalContext in 1.2 are not abstract, like

Re: [JSF 1.2] question

Ah, thanks. Some are some issues also the reasons, why UIComponent is not an interface? -Matthias On 6/5/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Backwards compatibility - at least of a sort; you won't get AbstractMethodErrors when using 1.1-compiled subclasses. -- Adam On 6/5/06, Matthias

ApacheCon EU

Hi there, this year the ApacheCon Eu takes place in Dublin. If anybody of you guys - hanging around here - is there, I think we should meet for a beer and watch some world cup matches :-) From the MyFaces team Gerald, Mario and me are there. I already started a thread at Apache's community

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

It's real cool that Matze is assigned to us full time now. He has never stopped loving the project, but now he's got the time as well. Mighty cool! regards, Martin On 6/6/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release. Thanks for

Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release

The logging was actually in shared BTW. Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 5, 2006 11:18 PM To: 'MyFaces Development' Subject: Re: Upcoming Tomahawk Release OK so once Dennis adds his logging stuff I will start the release.