[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499204
]
Cagatay Civici commented on TOMAHAWK-1009:
--
Thanks for the patch, I've assigned the issue to myself, I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lars Ködderitzsch updated TOMAHAWK-1009:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> DataScoller - FastForward has borderline
On May 25, 2007, at 4:31 AM, Manfred Geiler wrote:
Arguments pro 2.x.y:
A20.1. Tomcat does the same. They do not align there container
versions to the spec and nobody complains.
This is an excellent proposal and clearly takes all the factors we
have discussed into account. I would have no h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499118
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-1009:
-
Please submit this change in the form of a unified diff
DataScoller - FastForward has borderline issues
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1009
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1009
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Data
+1 to MyFaces Core 1.2.x.y for the JSF 1.2 implementation name.
On 5/25/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I want to get rid of that 1.2 vs. 2.0 discussion blocker. Therefore I
will try to summarize all of the arguments and collect the pros and
cons once more. The goal is to f
That's probably good enough. Keeps the "preserve" theme we've used
up to this point and accurately states what's preserved.
On 5/25/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
> How about "keepSubmittedValues" which is a bit more specific than
> keepInput?
>
> However, it doesn't matte
+1
On 5/25/07, Zubin Wadia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, great mediation Manfred.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/25/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I want to get rid of that 1.2 vs. 2.0 discussion blocker. Therefore I
> will try to summarize all of the arguments and collect
+1, great mediation Manfred.
Cheers,
Zubin.
On 5/25/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I want to get rid of that 1.2 vs. 2.0 discussion blocker. Therefore I
will try to summarize all of the arguments and collect the pros and
cons once more. The goal is to find a compromise
Manfred,
+1 for the Proposal.
Once the proposal is accepted, please post a proposal for the next version
number
for each affected sub project. I would posts one now for Tomahawk, but I do not
want to distract anyone.
Paul Spencer
Manfred Geiler wrote:
see inline
On 5/25/07, Paul Spencer <[E
see inline
On 5/25/07, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Manfred,
Thank you for this! Below are a couple questions.
Manfred Geiler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ok, here is my compromise proposal, which I hope everyone can live with:
> C1. We switch MyFaces Core to a 4 digit version numbering: 1
Manfred,
Thank you for this! Below are a couple questions.
Manfred Geiler wrote:
Hi all,
Ok, here is my compromise proposal, which I hope everyone can live with:
C1. We switch MyFaces Core to a 4 digit version numbering: 1.2.0.0 which
means
...
Is this supported by Maven?
>
I can live with that!
regards,
Martin
On 5/25/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 25/05/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds good... and the 4-number version mirrors somewhat the RI, they
...
> But I would not expect official spec-releases other than
On 25/05/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sounds good... and the 4-number version mirrors somewhat the RI, they
...
But I would not expect official spec-releases other than the
JSF-nextGeneration spec (JSF 2.0 or JSF6, I fear the latter still has
its lobby).
I guess
sounds good... and the 4-number version mirrors somewhat the RI, they
are at
1.2_04P02
so +1 (non-binding from me)
> A20.1. not solved. Well, MyFaces is not Tomcat...
It is something confusing with Tomcat... one has to search the ewb to
know which servlet-spec
correlates to which tomcat...
Jurgen Lust ha scritto:
Great job!
Thanks!
The drag and drop only seems to work in the month view however.
It also work in WEEK (not WORK_WEEK) mode! It is because WEEK and MONTH
have the same "day cell" and entry renderers.
In plan I've to introduce the same functionality in WORK_WEEK
+1 to your propsal of the numbering scheme...
The Blackdown people use something similar for their JDK Implementations.
Manfred Geiler schrieb:
> Hi all,
> I want to get rid of that 1.2 vs. 2.0 discussion blocker. Therefore I
> will try to summarize all of the arguments and collect the pros and
>
Honestly, I think this is the best compromise we can reach. Nice job,
+1
Bruno
On 25/05/07, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 to your propsal of the numbering scheme...
The Blackdown people use something similar for their JDK Implementations.
Manfred Geiler schrieb:
> Hi all,
> I wan
Hi Manfred!
For me, all in your post result in a simple +1 from my side ;-)
> A20.5. not solved, but if there is a JSF fix we must join all our
> influence and convice Ed to call it JSF-1.3 ;-)
This only happens if there is a minor release of the spec do we
have seen something in the past?
Ok this is
awesome...
Jurgen Lust schrieb:
> Hi Luca,
>
> Great job! I've put the example online here:
> https://ninja.ugent.be/dojoscheduler/dojoTests.jsf
>
> The drag and drop only seems to work in the month view however.
>
> Jurgen
>
> Op vrijdag 25-05-2007 om 09:05 uur [tijdzone +0
Hi all,
I want to get rid of that 1.2 vs. 2.0 discussion blocker. Therefore I
will try to summarize all of the arguments and collect the pros and
cons once more. The goal is to find a compromise that is acceptable
for all of us. I will try to be as impartial as possible. You will see
I'm no pighea
Hi Luca,
Great job! I've put the example online here:
https://ninja.ugent.be/dojoscheduler/dojoTests.jsf
The drag and drop only seems to work in the month view however.
Jurgen
Op vrijdag 25-05-2007 om 09:05 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Luca Conte:
> Hi,
> I'm a java senior developer, I'm from
Hi, i'm looking the method getValue() of UISelectItems:
public Object getValue()
{
if (_value != null) return _value;
ValueBinding vb = getValueBinding("value");
return vb != null ? vb.getValue(getFacesContext()) : null;
}
And I see that if a value p
23 matches
Mail list logo
