For example the definition of the following style sheet:
//.
These are styles defined only for quirks mode. But in CSS this feature is
not implemented...
Marius
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Jeanne Waldman
wrote:
> What do you mean by 'mode' dependent?
>
> Marius Petoi wrote, On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maria Kaval updated TRINIDAD-1732:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Code Cleanup: Move to using generics in the trinidad
Code Cleanup: Move to using generics in the trinidad-maven project
---
Key: TRINIDAD-1732
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1732
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maria Kaval updated TRINIDAD-1731:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Improve Formatting of Tag Doc Summary section
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835438#action_12835438
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1472:
--
Trying to do this issue I found the
What do you mean by 'mode' dependent?
Marius Petoi wrote, On 2/3/2010 11:17 PM PT:
Ok Jeanne. Thank you!
One more question, in order to transform the XSS files in CSS files, in
base-desktop.xss there are some styles which are mode-dependent. Should
we add @mode in the CSS? Or do you have an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835430#action_12835430
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2561:
To solve the problem with the MethodExpr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835428#action_12835428
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2561:
-
Thinking more about it maybe we need a
yeah! :)
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks to all people who vote.
>
> We have 7 +1
>
> Bernd Bohmann
> Gerhard Petracek
> Matthias Wessendorf
> Grant Smith
> Werner Punz
> Jakob Korherr
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> so we can continue with the necessary steps to relea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835391#action_12835391
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2561:
OK I finally solved the MethodExpression
Hi
Thanks to all people who vote.
We have 7 +1
Bernd Bohmann
Gerhard Petracek
Matthias Wessendorf
Grant Smith
Werner Punz
Jakob Korherr
Leonardo Uribe
so we can continue with the necessary steps to release myfaces core
2.0.0-beta-2
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835366#action_12835366
]
Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-1415:
--
I reformatted your patch because th
BeanValidator throws Exception if external ExpressionLanguageFactory is being
used
--
Key: MYFACES-2565
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2565
Project: M
Thanks Jakob!
Since this sounds like there is something more to do (and not only being me who
is to dumb/lazy to properly read documentation or code), I'll better open an
Jiraffe on this topic.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- Jakob Korherr schrieb am Do, 18.2.2010:
> Von: Jakob Korherr
> Betreff
Hi Mark,
I myself did not write this code, but I think it was written because it
was/is not known if all things will work with Java EE6's EL. So I guess it's
a kind of a reminder.
Furthermore I don't think that there are any web.xml parameters to change
this behavior.
Can you or someone else con
Hi!
Currently the BeanValidator has the following code:
if (_ExternalSpecifications.isUnifiedELAvailable())
{
//TODO: Implement when Unified EL for Java EE6 is available.
throw new FacesException("Unified EL for Java EE6 support is not yet
implemented");
}
I'm using EL-2.2 in MyFaces-2.0.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Jakob Korherr wrote:
> I just reopend the issue, because it has nothing to do with the facelets
> taglibs version problem as Michael said.
:-) I just saw "...If the answer to this question is "no", Facelets in
JSF 2"
and closed it :-)
>
> However the changes
Jakob,
I"m not sure I understand what about the fix you think is incorrect. I
could use a little more specific explanation.
In particular, why would you have to or want to use facelets 1.1.x in
this case? The spec says nothing other than that facelets in JSF 2.0 is
backwards compatible and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835299#action_12835299
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2561:
Good point, I haven't thought of that. O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835296#action_12835296
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2561:
-
The problem is do something like this
I just reopend the issue, because it has nothing to do with the facelets
taglibs version problem as Michael said.
However the changes are incorrect. Please see my comment in jira and please
revert the changes.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/2/18 Michael Concini
> I'm aware of the previous discussion, how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr reopened MYFACES-2564:
> facelets in an app with a 1.2 level faces-config do not work
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835289#action_12835289
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2564:
Please revert the changes, because on an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835286#action_12835286
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2561:
I don't see the problem with #{component
I'm aware of the previous discussion, however my understanding was that
it related more to supporting the using the legacy facelets library and
doesn't appear to have anything to do with faces-config versioning.
My fix in MYFACES-2564 just brings us into consistent behavior with how
verseion i
Popup is not modal enough
-
Key: TOBAGO-852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-852
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Themes
Affects Versions: 1.0.24
Environment:
Hey Michael,
I closed your MYFACES-2564 ticket, as we discussed this already.
There is another open ticket for the problem
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835261#action_12835261
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2561:
-
The reason why it is better to change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835259#action_12835259
]
Curtiss Howard commented on MYFACES-2458:
-
Fixed:
* If calling jsf.ajax.request(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835257#action_12835257
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2561:
-
I look ri code to find if they change
facelets in an app with a 1.2 level faces-config do not work
Key: MYFACES-2564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
concurrency bug
---
Key: EXTSCRIPT-67
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTSCRIPT-67
Project: MyFaces Extensions Scripting
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Werner Punz
Assignee: Werner Punz
P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTSCRIPT-62?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved EXTSCRIPT-62.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Dependency detection - interfaces not entirely correctly detected
> -
Concurrency problem - startup servlet filter
Key: EXTSCRIPT-66
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTSCRIPT-66
Project: MyFaces Extensions Scripting
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: W
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTSCRIPT-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved EXTSCRIPT-64.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> NPE in JSR199Compiler in certain situations
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTSCRIPT-61?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved EXTSCRIPT-61.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Fix parent pom relations before tagging alpha
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTSCRIPT-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Werner Punz resolved EXTSCRIPT-65.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> add optional compile whitelist
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Udo Schnurpfeil resolved TOBAGO-844.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5.0
1.5.0-alpha-2
> Change typ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835159#action_12835159
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2561:
Thanks for all your ideas, Leonardo, but
hi rudy,
you mentioned it correctly. it's a specific functionality
of AbstractCompareStrategy.
as alternative it's possible to provide a custom FacesMessageStorage which
filters messages before they get added (directly
in FacesMessageStorage#addFacesMessage). that would allow a better
performance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835148#action_12835148
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2563:
-
as we are on JSP, the getViewM
Yes.- this is a BUG it needs to support more than just 2.0
(Dan/Ed commented on the "open" list)
-Matthias
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> nope, but the web.xml setting for Trinidad's alternate view handler;
>
> it is complaining about the facelets embedded face
Trinidad 1.2.x generates on POSTBACK a NullPointerException on MyFAces2
---
Key: MYFACES-2563
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2563
Project: MyFaces Core
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved MYFACES-2562.
-
Resolution: Invalid
ok... I close it for now...
but I am not sure (yes, the spe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835144#action_12835144
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2562:
-
problem is this part of the js
javax.el.PropertyNotFoundException: The class
'javax.faces.component.UIViewRoot' does not have the property 'example'.
--
Key: MYFACES-2562
URL: ht
46 matches
Mail list logo