cleanup of UIInput
--
Key: MYFACES-2839
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2839
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.0.1
Reporter: Matthias Weßendorf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892225#action_12892225
]
Mark Struberg commented on MYFACES-2830:
Jakob, Michael: I think this is resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2830?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2830.
Fix Version/s: 2.0.2-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
You're right, Mark ;)
ourEL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892235#action_12892235
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2839:
For _ExternalSpecifications there is
Use a copied Iterator instead of the real Enumeration in
AbstractAttributeMap.AbstractAttributeIterator
---
Key: MYFACES-2840
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2840.
Fix Version/s: 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT
1.2.10-SNAPSHOT
Update AbstractAttributeMap and replace MockScopeMap with _ScopeMap
---
Key: MYFACESTEST-21
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACESTEST-21
Project: MyFaces Test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892265#action_12892265
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on MYFACES-2840:
Why can remove called during iterating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892273#action_12892273
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2840:
Hi Bernd,
I ran into this problem while
Extval Custom Java ExtValModuleConfig and OpenWebBeans - NPE during startup
WebContainer
-
Key: EXTVAL-109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-109
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892282#action_12892282
]
Mark Struberg commented on EXTVAL-109:
--
or use a @PostConstruct or @Inject method ;)
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess it depends on the goal.
If the goal is to incorporate new code into MyFaces, then it is much
easier to do it from the start as part of the on-going MyFaces project
rather than as a code drop at the end.
If
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/7/26 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Gerhard Petracek
gerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/7/26 Matthias
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892367#action_12892367
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2840:
-
Isn't better to deal with this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892399#action_12892399
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2840:
It seems that way, but this really is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892400#action_12892400
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2753:
-
I have attached a new patch with more
Hi guys,
Working on the tests for FlashImpl, I ran into a problem with the
AbstractAttributeMap (MYFACES-2840). After fixing it, I needed to copy my
changes over to myfaces-test to be able to use the new version in the test
case (MYFACESTEST-21). And this copying really sucks...
If you think
If it helps to make Shared obsolete you have my +1! :-)
/JK
2010/7/26 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
Working on the tests for FlashImpl, I ran into a problem with the
AbstractAttributeMap (MYFACES-2840). After fixing it, I needed to copy my
changes over to myfaces-test to
Yes, this is one of my goals :)
2010/7/26 Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com
If it helps to make Shared obsolete you have my +1! :-)
/JK
2010/7/26 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hi guys,
Working on the tests for FlashImpl, I ran into a problem with the
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Working on the tests for FlashImpl, I ran into a problem with the
AbstractAttributeMap (MYFACES-2840). After fixing it, I needed to copy my
changes over to myfaces-test to be able to use the new version in
Hehe, yeah I maybe forgot 10 many.
I can provide a wiki page for the general idea and the approach used on
myfaces-test. Then everyone can adopt this idea and see how it works.
RIP _shared? :)
-- yes!
Regards,
Jakob
2010/7/26 Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:56
Hi
Thanks to all people who vote.
We have 11 +1
Matthias Wessendorf
Scott O'Bryan
Jan Kees van Andel
Bruno Aranda
Martin Marinschek
Gerhard Petracek
Mark Struberg
Jakob Korherr
Hazem Saleh
Werner Punz
Leonardo Uribe
so we can continue with the steps to use the new stuff for release.
regards,
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:30 PM, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hehe, yeah I maybe forgot 10 many.
I can provide a wiki page for the general idea and the approach used on
myfaces-test.
+1
Then everyone can adopt this idea and see how it works.
great. I have that on my agenda
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892432#action_12892432
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2838:
I tried your WAR in my local tomcat and
Thanks for driving this Leo!
Most plugin upgrades should be pretty much no-brainers, but we should keep an
eye on the maven-site-plugin upgrade.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Sent: Mon, July 26, 2010 9:30:19 PM
Subject:
Hi
Ok, good to know that.
I created a issue to start the procedure:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2902
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2010/7/26 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Thanks for driving this Leo!
Most plugin upgrades should be pretty much no-brainers, but we should keep
Hi all,
I agree, duplicated code has to be avoided and when the maven-shade-plugin
can help, the better.
but I think we have to define which project supplies code for which other
project (so that we don't get a spaghetti (using the tomatoes ;) or get
circular dependencies.). I know that MyFaces
Hi Rudy,
Yes we totally have to be careful with circular dependencies, but it should
not be that big problem.
Actually I think that the opposite is true. MyFaces core is the JSF
implementation and MyFaces test provides the Mock classes for JSF, and for
implementing these Mock classes it can
Hi Jakob,
So it was never the idea that MyFaces Test (and maybe the GSOC testing
effort) will be used to supply the test infrastructure for MyFaces Core?
In that case : MyFaces Core can supply code.
Regards
Rudy.
On 26 July 2010 22:01, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rudy,
Actually this already is the case: MyFaces-test is used for testing MyFaces
core.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/7/26 Rudy De Busscher rdebussc...@gmail.com
Hi Jakob,
So it was never the idea that MyFaces Test (and maybe the GSOC testing
effort) will be used to supply the test infrastructure for
+1 for the maven shade plugin
I have used it quite extensively in ext-scripting works really well.
You just can bundle the classes or do a full namespace refactoring with
it on binary level.
Am 26.07.10 20:56, schrieb Jakob Korherr:
Hi guys,
Working on the tests for FlashImpl, I ran into a
for sure i vote: +1!
(way more than just 10 :) )
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2010/7/26 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hehe, yeah I maybe forgot 10
Hi
Yes, it is true, that myfaces-test is used for testing myfaces core, but in
theory, myfaces-test should be used to test jsf stuff without rely on a
specific jsf implementation.
In this case I think (and it is my personal opinion) it is better to have
some duplicate code and keep things
Why would you like to have any duplicate code? This should not be anyone's
target in my opinion...
2010/7/26 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
Hi
Yes, it is true, that myfaces-test is used for testing myfaces core, but in
theory, myfaces-test should be used to test jsf stuff without rely on a
Hi
The code that is duplicated on myfaces-test is code that is used for
implement a mock object (in this case MockExternalContext). This code is
just some wrappers and it is not expected this will change in the future. So
the question is why bother us in this case? In this case use
I think you are both right. I can understand that copying code is really ugly,
but otoh Leos argument is also pretty strong.
There is a solution for this. Cut off the shared parts and move it into an own
module.
This sounds easy but isn't always doable. But it might be worth a try.
LieGrue,
This code is just some wrappers and it is not expected this will change in
the future. So the question is why bother us in this case? In this case use
maven-shade-plugin is not worth.
Actually and quite frankly it really is worth it. It is very easy and if you
understand it, it is even easier
Hi
2010/7/26 Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
This code is just some wrappers and it is not expected this will change in
the future. So the question is why bother us in this case? In this case use
maven-shade-plugin is not worth.
Actually and quite frankly it really is worth it. It is
I think you're right. The only real solution is a nice and clean Shared
project. Otherwise the dependencies will become very tangled.
/JK
Sent from my iPad
Op 26 jul. 2010 om 23:10 heeft Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com het volgende
geschreven:
Hi
2010/7/26 Jakob Korherr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12892527#action_12892527
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on EXTVAL-109:
-
@mark:
extval isn't based on cdi - that
-tr-inhibit does not work with icon skinning selectors
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1866
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1866
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved EXTCDI-33.
Resolution: Fixed
conversations: performance improvements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1826?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mamallan Uthaman updated TRINIDAD-1826:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
Page Navigation and PPR Broken in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mamallan Uthaman updated TRINIDAD-1825:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
PPR Broken in Windows Mobile 6
So - without the dependencies problem - +100 for getting rid of
shared. The sooner this goes, the better.
But, of course: make sure the shade thing runs smoothly with the IDE
integration (I want to be able to check-out the sample app and start
working, highly favored best case: without having to
46 matches
Mail list logo
