+1 for extra examples.
With mercurial, I had already some 'strange' things (like directories not
visible in pre-commit list but still commited, ...) but probably better for
forking/branching. So no opinion about the technology used.
Regards
Rudy.
On 18 December 2010 12:21, Werner Punz
Actually after recomparing GIT and mercurial I still think Git is the
better although harder to handle system.
Too bad that Google code does not allow GIT as well.
Werner
Am 20.12.10 10:07, schrieb Rudy De Busscher:
+1 for extra examples.
With mercurial, I had already some 'strange' things
Ok just saw google code also allows git.
But I am perfectly fine with Merc, I just dont have any real experiences
with it except for reading the literature about it and having my
personal gripes. But I never really want to go back to a centralized
system with no local history.
As for the
Ok correction as it seems there is no direct git support, it is just a
mirror like Apache does it, sorry for the wrong info.
Werner
Am 20.12.10 10:20, schrieb Werner Punz:
Ok just saw google code also allows git.
But I am perfectly fine with Merc, I just dont have any real experiences
with
*.htm files are not identified as mime-type text/html
-
Key: TOBAGO-960
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-960
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
High live memory usage from SkinStyleProvider
-
Key: TRINIDAD-1985
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1985
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
