+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/3/23 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
+1
2011/3/22 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.9 release of Apache MyFaces
Builder Plugin out.
This release includes some minor changes necessary to build myfaces core
2.0.x
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks good
or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the
trinidad package as being metadata complete in order to help avoid
log a warning message to warn the developers if rowkey is set but not unset at
the end of the request
-
Key: TRINIDAD-2070
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yuan Gao updated TRINIDAD-2070:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
log a warning message to warn the developers if rowkey is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACESTEST-46?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACESTEST-46.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT
I tried different
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.2 release of Apache
MyFaces Test out.
Note these artifacts are necessary to start the release of
myfaces core 2.0.5.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.test v1.0.2 [1]
+1
On 3/24/2011 12:32 PM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the
trinidad package as
+1. Thanks for putting this together Scott!
Andy
+1
2011/3/24 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.2 release of Apache
MyFaces Test out.
Note these artifacts are necessary to start the release of
myfaces core 2.0.5.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven
Hi
As a side note:
SO There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the trinidad package
SO as being metadata complete in order to help avoid having to
scan the jar for
SO class annotations at runtime.
Reading JSF 2.0 spec, metadata-complete is only used on
WEB-INF/faces-config.xml.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13010887#comment-13010887
]
Simon Godard edited comment on MYFACES-2979 at 3/24/11 8:09 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13010887#comment-13010887
]
Simon Godard commented on MYFACES-2979:
---
I'm experiencing the same problem
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces builder plugin 1.0.9
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 4:00 PM
+1
Regards,
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/3/24 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
+1
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Jakob Korherr jakob.korh...@gmail.com
Hey Leonrado,
The change is to allow the plugin to generate metadata-complete=true for
trinidad-impl's faces-config.xml.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2068
Max
On 3/24/2011 3:50 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi
As a side note:
SO There were some minor fixes and the
+1
-- Blake Sullivan
On 3/24/11 9:32 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad Maven Plugins v.
2.0.5 released and not I need a vote as to whether everything looks
good or not. There were some minor fixes and the plugins now mark the
Hi
2011/3/24 Max Starets max.star...@oracle.com:
Hey Leonrado,
The change is to allow the plugin to generate metadata-complete=true for
trinidad-impl's faces-config.xml.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2068
The problem here is this config will be ignored by myfaces core,
Well there ya go. Thanks for commenting Leonardo. I did not know
that.. :D
Is this going to be a showstopper for the release or (since it's
ignored) are people okay with having it in our FacesConfig for now? I
personally think it can't hurt but the spec does seem pretty clear on
the
Leonardo,
I have tested metadata-complete with Mojarra, and it is not ignored. I
can point you to the Mojarra code that does the check.
From what I understand, this feature was included a while ago (during
the initial 2.0 release) after Andy Schwartz lobbied for it. It looks
like the spec was
Leonardo,
The check in Mojarra is done in
com.sun.faces.config.ConfigManager.getAnnotationScanURLs().
Andy can probably dig out EG e-mails where this was agreed.
Thanks,
Max
On 3/24/2011 5:35 PM, Max Starets wrote:
Leonardo,
I have tested metadata-complete with Mojarra, and it is not
I, for one, am all for having it in. It's not like it will break anything
and if it gives a performance boost, all the better.
Max, we may want to generate a bug against the spec to see if they can fix
that. Is that possible?
On Mar 24, 2011, at 3:49 PM, Max Starets max.star...@oracle.com
Gang -
Looking back at the EG emails, I realize now that I dropped the ball
on making sure that my proposed changes actually made it into the
spec.
Here was my original email (Metadata complete jar files) from
Septeber 3, 2009:
Gang -
Section 11.5.1 of the spec defines the following
faces-config.xml metadata-complete=true on jar files under META-INF are
recognized, but not documented
Key: MYFACES-3082
URL:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree with the proposed behavior, and I don't think do it could
cause any problems. So from my side there is no objections about the
artifacts
Hey Andy,
I'm wondering if there should be a TCK check for this as well since the
behavior has come into question.
Scott
On 03/24/2011 03:57 PM, Andy Schwartz wrote:
Gang -
Looking back at the EG emails, I realize now that I dropped the ball
on making sure that my proposed changes actually
WOW!! Someone's on the ball. Way to move on this Leonardo. It was an
awesome observation...
Scott
On 03/24/2011 04:04 PM, Leonardo Uribe (JIRA) wrote:
faces-config.xml metadata-complete=true on jar files under META-INF are
recognized, but not documented
Is that a +1? :D
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree with the proposed behavior, and I don't think do
+1
2011/3/24 Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com:
Is that a +1? :D
On Mar 24, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I have created these issues:
http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-952
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3082
I agree
28 matches
Mail list logo
