Hi Martin,
Yes, I have found that findComponent is supossed to search from the
'rootComponent' if the expression searched starts with ':' (value of
NamingContainer.SEPARATOR_CHAR), but I tried with render=":text" and still
don't works.
Also, you can add the context param javax.faces.SEPARATOR_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058141#comment-13058141
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3199:
-
Problem 1: The spec javadoc is clear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3200.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.2
2.0.8
Assignee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058093#comment-13058093
]
Leonardo Uribe edited comment on MYFACES-3200 at 6/30/11 9:40 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058093#comment-13058093
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3200:
-
Thanks for the example. It helped a l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058090#comment-13058090
]
Matt Benson commented on MYFACES-3200:
--
Great! I was also going to say that yes, i
Improve EL Exceptions wrapping
--
Key: MYFACES-3202
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3202
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Martin Kočí
Priority: Minor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058046#comment-13058046
]
Martin Kočí commented on MYFACES-3201:
--
Please notice that proposed new behaviour d
Publish exception in lifecycle methods (process*) instead of re-thrown
--
Key: MYFACES-3201
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3201
Project: MyFaces Core
Iss
+1 for 3.
Option 4. doesn't cause any conflict, so we can just keep that code as is.
2011/6/30 Leonardo Uribe :
> Hi
>
> To reference images inside a css file in JSF 2.0, users have to change
> its code from this:
>
> .someclass
> {
> ...
> background-image:url('myimage.gif');
> ...
> }
>
> to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13058009#comment-13058009
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3200:
-
Maybe this is caused by the commit do
Hi
Ok, I already send it. I hope it is clear the problem we are discussing about.
@Jakob: do you have any other issue related to the current
implementation done in myfaces-commons-resourcehandler that we need to
take a decision?
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/6/30 Gerhard Petracek :
> ok - so pl
Hi
To reference images inside a css file in JSF 2.0, users have to change
its code from this:
.someclass
{
...
background-image:url('myimage.gif');
...
}
to this:
.someclass
{
...
background-image:url(#{resource['mylib:myimage.gif']});
...
}
This means a lot of changes, including overr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057939#comment-13057939
]
Matt Benson commented on MYFACES-3200:
--
Not sure what if anything richfaces is cont
ok - so please start a vote about it.
describe the topic and why you think something has to be changed
(compared to the original commit >in combination with< the addition
mentioned by martin).
please write it very concisely! we won't get a lot of votes, if the
description is too verbose.
thx & reg
All values of self-defined composite-component attributes disappear unexpected.
---
Key: MYFACES-3200
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200
Project: MyFaces
2011/6/30 Gerhard Petracek :
> hi @ all,
>
> what jakob is talking about makes a lot of sense to me.
>
> @jakob:
> please don't fork it.
>
> imo we should continue with the approach started by jakob + the
> addition mentioned by martin. after finishing that we can think about
> further improvements
hi @ all,
what jakob is talking about makes a lot of sense to me.
@jakob:
please don't fork it.
imo we should continue with the approach started by jakob + the
addition mentioned by martin. after finishing that we can think about
further improvements (if needed at all).
@leo:
do you feel we nee
2011/6/30 Jakob Korherr :
> Hm, you're not getting it. This
>
>> To do it correctly we need to detect if this is a servlet 3.0
>> container and do the necessary stuff, but we need to test what happen
>> if a 2.5 or 2.4 web.xml file is deployed on a 3.0 container.
>> Additionally, we need to take ca
Hm, you're not getting it. This
> To do it correctly we need to detect if this is a servlet 3.0
> container and do the necessary stuff, but we need to test what happen
> if a 2.5 or 2.4 web.xml file is deployed on a 3.0 container.
> Additionally, we need to take care about do not call 3.0 code in
2011/6/30 Jakob Korherr :
>> [...] The new alternative proposed is similar.
>
> This alternative is not "new"! My first version of the
> AdvancedResourceHandler (before you started committing) already did
> exactly this! (However, assuming /faces/* as mapping if the page was
> accessed via suffix m
> [...] The new alternative proposed is similar.
This alternative is not "new"! My first version of the
AdvancedResourceHandler (before you started committing) already did
exactly this! (However, assuming /faces/* as mapping if the page was
accessed via suffix mapping, but making it configurable w
Hi Jakob
2011/6/30 Jakob Korherr :
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank you so much for your mail!
>
> This is exactly my point of view about the ResourceHandler. However,
> Leonardo in I kinda got into a "fight" about it and unfortunately, I
> do not have time for that right now!
For me this is just a work th
Hi
2011/6/30 Martin Marinschek :
> Hi guys,
>
> let me weigh in on the filter question: please, no filter!
>
> @prefix suffix mappings: you can get the registered mappings
>
> in previous servlet versions: parsing the web.xml
> in servlet 3.0: via the API
> http://download.oracle.com/javaee/6/api/
Hi Martin,
Thank you so much for your mail!
This is exactly my point of view about the ResourceHandler. However,
Leonardo in I kinda got into a "fight" about it and unfortunately, I
do not have time for that right now!
Leonardo, please reconsider my reasoning from the previous mails of
this disc
25 matches
Mail list logo
