Re: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.2.1

+1 2014-03-04 6:40 GMT+01:00 Leonardo Uribe : > Hi, > > I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.1 release of Apache > MyFaces core out. > > The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip). > > Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts: > 1.

[jira] [Commented] (ORCHESTRA-63) JSF 2.2.5 - Compatibility for Orchestra

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-63?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13920021#comment-13920021 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on ORCHESTRA-63: - We need to create new artifacts compa

[jira] [Created] (ORCHESTRA-65) Create artifacts compatible with JSF 2.2

Leonardo Uribe created ORCHESTRA-65: --- Summary: Create artifacts compatible with JSF 2.2 Key: ORCHESTRA-65 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-65 Project: MyFaces Orchestra

Re: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.2.1

+1 Am 04.03.2014 um 06:41 schrieb Leonardo Uribe : > +1 > > 2014-03-04 0:40 GMT-05:00 Leonardo Uribe : >> Hi, >> >> I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.2.1 release of Apache >> MyFaces core out. >> >> The artifacts passed the TCK test of Feb 2013 (jsftck-2.2_26-Feb-2013.zip). >> >> Pl

Result (Was: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.0.21)

Hi Thanks to all people who vote. We have 4 +1 Werner Punz Grant Smith Paul Nicolucci Leonardo Uribe so we can continue with the necessary steps to release MyFaces Core 2.0.21 regards, Leonardo Uribe

Result (Was: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.1.15)

Hi Thanks to all people who vote. We have 5 +1 Mark Struberg Werner Punz Hazem Saleh Paul Nicolucci Leonardo Uribe so we can continue with the necessary steps to release MyFaces Core 2.1.15 regards, Leonardo Uribe

Re: Possible performance enchancement?

Hi I doubt you can get a significant improvement, but anyway I think it is possible to write a custom component extending for example from UIPanel and override processValidations(...) method, so the validation step is not propagated to the children. Then you put that component wrapping the datatab

Re: Possible performance enchancement?

you need the traversal anyway e.g. to convert the values (which is done during the same traversal). your numbers sound way too high -> imo you have a different issue in your application. -> we need more details about your setup. regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - J

Re: Possible performance enchancement?

As the scenario is really special, what about overwriting the JSF Lifecycle and modify it for your requirements? 2014-03-01 9:28 GMT+01:00 Karl Trumstedt : > Hello, > > I've been looking and reading a lot about JSF's lifecycle. I'm no expert > in any sense and have not fully grasped what happens

Possible performance enchancement?

Hello, I've been looking and reading a lot about JSF's lifecycle. I'm no expert in any sense and have not fully grasped what happens in each phase. I have debugged our application and seen how much time is spent in each cycle. For larger pages it can be quite a lot (500 ms for each APPLY, VALIDAT

[ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache MyFaces Extensions CDI 1.0.6

The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the 13th release of Apache MyFaces Extensions CDI (aka CODI). Apache MyFaces CODI provides portable CDI extensions for the Java-Platform (SE and EE). CODI is a modularized and extensible toolbox for CDI based applications. The release of CODI v1.0.6