On Thu, December 23, 2004 10:35 am, Matthias Wessendorf said:
>
> [ ] +1 - Yes, Release the current code as 1.0.8-beta
> [X] +0 - Can't see why not
> [ ] -1 - Please don't. Here's why:.
>
+1
Anton
On Fri, January 7, 2005 6:32 am, Martin Marinschek said:
> +1 for a meta decision ;)
>
>
> On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 15:25:17 +0100, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> What about this decision itself, do we need a meta decision process? ;-)
>> Oh, I love recursive self-ref
Jon,
Thanks for your interest in MyFaces!
You are correct that the interfaces your are mentioning are intended to be
used to extend the corresponding EL features easily.
Please enter a Jira request for enhancement, so we have a track of this
issue.
I would like to not make those interfaces publ
Jon,
Stan is correct. If you do use those interfaces directly, then that part
of your code will be MyFaces specific--those interfaces are not JSR
compliant. If you do not want to have MyFaces specific code, then you
should be able to use MyFaces without any additional changes.
Regards,
Anton
On
Hi All,
Congratulations to all for officially making MyFaces into a top level Apache
project!
For the last couple of years, I believe the project has come a long way from
its small beginnings. All of this is thanks to the contribution of every one
of you, regardless of how large or small. Open
On Tue, May 31, 2005 2:30 pm, Sean Schofield said:
> Thre is a class: o.a.m.context.servlet.CookieMap. Looks like Anton
Koinov is one of the authors ... not sure what this class is for. One
of our users was asking about it. Perhaps it predates the inclusion of
cookie map in the external cont
I will come. Count me + 1...
On Mon, June 13, 2005 12:14 pm, Jonas Jacobi said:
> Hi All,
>
> As I mentioned in a previous email I have now managed to organize a
> place where we can get together during the JavaOne conference. I have
> made a preliminary reservation for 15 people (eating) at the T
On Friday 12 August 2005 09:22, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> On 8/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like the implicit Object map is missing the following:
> >
> > application
> > request
> > session
>
> Personally, I would suggest that we *not* try to make implicit
> var
