Re: [jsr-314-open] JSF gathering @ JavaOne (was Re: MyFaces @JavaOne?)

2010-09-23 Thread Ed Burns
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 12:54:09 -0700, Kito Mann kito.m...@virtua.com said: Kito Hello everyone, Kito Let's meet at the Thirsty Bear instead, so people can show up later if Kito necessary. I'm doing a podcast with Dan Allen until 6 or so. What's the best Kito time for everyone? 7pm. Can you

Re: [jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-2614) EnumConverter uses toString() instead of name()

2010-03-19 Thread Ed Burns
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:41:27 + (UTC), Jakob Korherr (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org said: JK [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] JK Jakob Korherr resolved MYFACES-2614. JK

Re: [FYI] BeanValidation at Apache

2010-03-19 Thread Ed Burns
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 08:22:10 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org said: MW Hi, MW there is a new podling around the BeanValidation JSR 303, at Apache. MW Undergoing incubation right now. Sourcecode is up here: MW http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bval/trunk/ For Apache community

Tomahawk: t:dataList for JSF2 Facelets?

2009-11-24 Thread Ed Burns
Hello MyFaces team, Please excuse this mail if there is a separate list for Tomahawk dev. There probably is, but I'm not on it. Can anyone share any plans regarding a JSF2 Facelets version of Tomahawk? In particular, t:dataList. Thanks, Ed -- | ed.bu...@sun.com | office: 408 884 9519 OR

Re: JSF 2.0 - Bean Validation, Unified EL and other specs

2009-11-03 Thread Ed Burns
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:06:04 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org said: MW Hi Jan-Kees, MW thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like to see something like this. MW Sounds (to me) very useful... Note that there is a precedent for doing this kind of discovery without requiring a Java

Re: JSF 2.0 - Bean Validation, Unified EL and other specs

2009-11-03 Thread Ed Burns
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:29:22 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org said: MW On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Ed Burns ed.bu...@sun.com wrote: On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:06:04 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org said: MW Hi Jan-Kees, MW thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-1124) numberconverter has issue with bigdecimal

2008-06-20 Thread Ed Burns (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12606900#action_12606900 ] Ed Burns commented on TRINIDAD-1124: Hello Matthias, I made the change you

Re: [Trinidad] Adding new methods to RenderingContext/RequestContext - abstract or not?

2008-02-19 Thread Ed Burns
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:21:45 -0500, Andy Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AS Gang - AS As part of the fix for TRINIDAD-822, I am proposing to add a new AS getAccessibilityProfile() API to RequestContext (and now that I think AS about it, to RenderingContext as well). Both RequestContext and

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1687) Update Model didn't throw an exception if an exception occurred, but adds a message for display to the user

2007-08-24 Thread Ed Burns (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12522640 ] Ed Burns commented on MYFACES-1687: --- I will bring this to the JSF 2.0 EG. Ed Update Model didn't throw

Re: defacto standard for EL Flash scope?

2006-03-13 Thread Ed Burns
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 12:15:52 -0800, Ed Burns [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: EB As you know, JSF 1.2 is fast drawing to a close and the scope is such EB that we can't get any new big features in. EB However, Sun's and Apache's JSF 1.1 impls are open source, so there is EB room for us to make defacto

Re: defacto standard for EL Flash scope?

2006-03-13 Thread Ed Burns
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:49:49 -0800, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AW I have very mixed emotions about rushing into any standards here, AW de-facto or otherwise. There's a lot of different ideas here, AW and I don't want to latch into any one just yet. Let's AW take our time to get this

defacto standard for EL Flash scope?

2006-03-09 Thread Ed Burns
As you know, JSF 1.2 is fast drawing to a close and the scope is such that we can't get any new big features in. However, Sun's and Apache's JSF 1.1 impls are open source, so there is room for us to make defacto standards if both of us provide the same interface to the user. One thing I wanted

Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo

2006-02-18 Thread Ed Burns
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:05:40 -0800, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: JF Wendy is exactly right. Of course, it would be much more convenient JF if the JSF 1.2 jars were on ibiblio.org to avoid the extra JF configuration to pick up the java.netrepository. much, I don't know about that. How

Re: JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo

2006-02-15 Thread Ed Burns
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:00:38 -0500, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SS Are there plans for maven2 artifacts? I've heard it's possible to access an m1 repo from m2. We'll try to update the plugin to m2 and take it from there. Ed -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | {home: 407 869 9587,

JSF 1.2 in a Maven 1 Repo

2006-02-14 Thread Ed Burns
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:11:24 -0800 07:08:28 -0500, Adam Winer said: AW - the lack (AFAIK) of a JSF impl in the public maven AWrepository - obviously, we can trivially point that to AWMyFaces api and impl AW - Our tests use a Mock JSF impl that's just a mockmaker AWrun over jsf-api

Incorrect SVN info for tomahawk only on website

2006-02-07 Thread Ed Burns
On http://myfaces.apache.org/svn.html it advises me to use the following command to check out the tomahawk-only svn module: svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk-only But when I do so, I get: svn: URL 'https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/tomahawk-only' doesn't exist

Re: Bookmarking, History and JSF

2006-01-27 Thread Ed Burns
Gruß Gott, On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:43:23 +0100, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: WP +1000 for a get WP Martin Marinschek schrieb: MM I'm having ideas again. Must come from too much work with JSF ;) MM MM My idea: MM MM Bookmarking is a problem with JSF, right? Except you use

Re: Bookmarking, History and JSF

2006-01-27 Thread Ed Burns
Hallo Manolito, Wie geht es in Wien? On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:06:26 +0100, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MG As Ed noted, saving everything into the GET request does not work MG because of URL size limitations. Old stagers within the MyFaces MG community might remember the so called

Re: Require ordering of for loading META-INF/faces-config.xml files from component jar

2005-12-05 Thread Ed Burns
--- Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, no one was. It's a workaround, but it's awkward at least. Still, it's better than nothing, and if it is in the Spec like this, we'll need to implement it. To be clear, this isn't in the spec. The resolution of this issue in the JSF

Re: Require ordering of for loading META-INF/faces-config.xml files from component jar

2005-12-05 Thread Ed Burns
At the time of the original discussion, we proposed better ways of handling this which should be archived in the mailing list. (I think Martin and Craig were also involved at the time, and we hammered out a reasonable dependency-handling approach). I'm not really sure why Ed went

name attribute on h:form

2005-11-08 Thread Ed Burns
Hello MyFaces Developers, I have downloaded and built the Tomahawk components and ran them with the JSF 1.2 impl. Doing so, I discovered that the example app uses h:form name=whatever frequently. The name attribute is not in the spec so supporting it breaks portability to other

##jsf IRC channel

2005-11-04 Thread Ed Burns
Hello MyFaces developers and users, Wide distribution intended. I'm sure all of us working on JSF technologies are aware of the growing popularity of Ruby on Rails. One manifestation of this popularity is the vitality of the community around the technology, and one manifestation of that

Automated testing and Logging in MyFaces

2005-10-04 Thread Ed Burns
Hello MyFaces Team, Overe in the Sun implementation, we use Cactus, Junit, and HTMLUnit for our automated tests. What do you use? Where are the tests located? Do you employ test driven development techniques? Also, what is the story for enabling and disabling logging in parts of the MyFaces

Re: JSF 1.2 and TCK

2005-09-14 Thread Ed Burns
Congrats on passing the TCK! I agree with what Craig said, it's good for the customers to have multiple implementations to choose from. I'd love to see you guys start looking at 1.2, but you'll have to prod the tomcat people to implement JSP 2.1. In the meantime, you can get working on JSF

pre JIRA issues

2005-09-14 Thread Ed Burns
Hello MyFaces, Are the legacy bugzilla issues accessible via JIRA queries? If not, how can I access the old bugzilla issues. Ed -- | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | {home: 407 869 9587, office: 408 884 9519 OR x31640} | homepage: | http://purl.oclc.org/NET/edburns/ | aim: edburns0sunw | iim:

Re: JSF 1.2 and TCK

2005-04-19 Thread Ed Burns
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:01:51 -0400, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: SS What about the 1.2 changes that do not conflict with 1.1? For SS example, encryption of the client-side state. Does it make sense to SS implement those features now as long as they don't interfere with the SS 1.1

Re: [announce] Now Available: Public Review Draft of the JavaServer Faces Technology 1.2 Specification (JSR 252)

2005-04-15 Thread Ed Burns
MW are those thing addressed that Hans wrote in his article? MW MW like a) MW h:label for=inputField1... MW h:inputText id=inputField1 ... MW MW or b) MW h:commandLink action=go MW click me MW /h:commandLink Definately, but the fix depends on JSP 2.1 since we had to make changes to JSP to make

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-193) forceId does not work on inputHidden

2005-04-15 Thread Ed Burns (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-193?page=comments#action_62924 ] Ed Burns commented on MYFACES-193: -- ForceId seems to be a proprietary feature. Please consider using the new prependId feature of UIForm, in the 1.2 version of the Faces

RE: Who belongs to the 'apsite' group on Minotaur?

2005-04-15 Thread Ed Burns
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:15:52 -0500, Stan Silvert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I will point out, however, that JBoss is a J2EE licensee, and, as such, they already have access to SS the TCK. Stan? SS Cool. I didn't know it gave us access to the JSF TCK today. I thought SS we would have to wait