[EMAIL PROTECTED] is the right choice for this.
-M
On 9/7/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a direct SVN link:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/jsr-301-ri.xml
>
>
> --Manfred
>
>
> On 9/7/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a direct SVN link:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/site-author/ip-clearance/jsr-301-ri.xml
--Manfred
On 9/7/07, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I committed the ip-clearance under the name "jsr-301-ri.xml" 3 days ago.
> But it did not show up yet. Perh
I committed the ip-clearance under the name "jsr-301-ri.xml" 3 days ago.
But it did not show up yet. Perhaps we have to ping someone to rebuild
the incubator site?
--Manfred
On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but I think the ruling says that the commit needs to be don
Wendy,
I did the upload for md5/sha1
-M
On 9/1/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should we ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if there is someone who wants to support
> > us? Shouldn't be too complicated, right? As soon as I get a link
Yes, but I think the ruling says that the commit needs to be done by
an Apache member.
regards,
Martin
On 9/1/07, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should we ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if there is someone who wants to support
> > u
On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if there is someone who wants to support
> us? Shouldn't be too complicated, right? As soon as I get a link / the
> document, I'll ask there.
(Not following this one closely, but) follow the instructions h
Sure - baby has settled in, I can take over. But there is not a form
yet, right? So I'll need to prepare this together with Scott, I
suppose.
regards,
Martin
On 9/1/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> can u take over ?
>
>
>
> On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTE
+1
can u take over ?
On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if there is someone who wants to support
> us? Shouldn't be too complicated, right? As soon as I get a link / the
> document, I'll ask there.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 9/1/07,
Should we ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] if there is someone who wants to support
us? Shouldn't be too complicated, right? As soon as I get a link / the
document, I'll ask there.
regards,
Martin
On 9/1/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my guess is nobody...,yet !
>
> -M
>
> On 9/1/0
my guess is nobody...,yet !
-M
On 9/1/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok guys,
>
> can you send me the IP-Clearance-form as well? It should be a small
> segment of X(HT)ML code. Can you tell me who is the Apache member who
> took on to commit this?
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> O
Ok guys,
can you send me the IP-Clearance-form as well? It should be a small
segment of X(HT)ML code. Can you tell me who is the Apache member who
took on to commit this?
regards,
Martin
On 8/31/07, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matthias, Scott,
>
> has the IP Clearance form
Hi Matthias, Scott,
has the IP Clearance form already been filled out and committed?
regards,
Martin
On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but all this, can be fixed, when it's already committed.
>
> We needed NOTICE and LICENSE files inside both JARs as well.
>
> -M
>
>
but all this, can be fixed, when it's already committed.
We needed NOTICE and LICENSE files inside both JARs as well.
-M
On 8/17/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yes pom as well.
>
> and also files in:
> -META-INF/services/
> -META-INF/
>
> @myfaces: a bug
>
> On
Hi,
yes pom as well.
and also files in:
-META-INF/services/
-META-INF/
@myfaces: a bug
On 8/17/07, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey, it looks like I did the impl, just not the API. I'm fixing that now.
>
> That said, does the liscence need to be in the POM files? I didn't
>
Hey, it looks like I did the impl, just not the API. I'm fixing that now.
That said, does the liscence need to be in the POM files? I didn't
notice a liscence in the MyFaces 1.2 POM files... I have no problems
putting it in, certainly, but we may want to make the 1.2 branch of
MyFaces compl
15 matches
Mail list logo
