Hey everyone,
I completed a migration to Trinidad to allow it to work with either
Portlet 1.0 or Portlet 2.0. Portlet 2.0 containers will support AJAX.
So here is my problem. In order to support extra functionality of
Portlet 2.0, I need to compile against a Portlet 2.0 container. Most of
e extra jar to be added to their web-inf.lib.
>
> It is a LOT harder to support portlet 1.0 by default and add a jar for
> portlet 2.0 because of the way the architecture works. Possible, but
> hard.
>
> Please let me know if either of these options sounds acceptabl
2009/4/21 Scott O'Bryan
> Yes I agree Matthias. Anyone else have a contrary opinion?
I agree as well.
>
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hey everyone,
>>>
>>> I completed a migration to Trinidad to allow it to work with e
The TrinidadDemo that is included in TrinidadExample distribution
download on the MyFaces/Trinidad site runs against the current version
of the Portlet 2.0 bridge. There are some problems -- mostly related to
lack of Trinidad pop-up support in the portlet environment which the
example relies o
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I completed a migration to Trinidad to allow it to work with either Portlet
> 1.0 or Portlet 2.0. Portlet 2.0 containers will support AJAX.
>
> So here is my problem. In order to support extra functionality of Portlet
> 2
Yes I agree Matthias. Anyone else have a contrary opinion?
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
Hey everyone,
I completed a migration to Trinidad to allow it to work with either Portlet
1.0 or Portlet 2.0. Portlet 2.0 containers will support A
