Re: [Trinidad] navigationTree not refactored???

2007-10-08 Thread Adam Winer
It's desperately in need of refactoring to extend off of the new TreeRenderer, and not the old 'uix' one. -- Adam On 10/8/07, Cristi Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all! I need I really need the navigationTree and I noticed the renderer is still in the 'uix' package and that the code

Re: [Trinidad] navigationTree not refactored???

2007-10-08 Thread Cristi Toth
Hi Adam! No problem, I'll do it. But I need to know some start points... i.e. It took me some 1/2 hour to figure that the actual renderer that does the job is the NavigationTreeRenderer from ui.laf.desktop package not the close to useless one from the uix package. Is something from the uix

Re: [Trinidad] navigationTree not refactored???

2007-10-08 Thread Adam Winer
Ah, OK, I see the confusion. The renderer in uix handles the decoding side of things. The renderer in uinode handles just the rendering thing, 'cause it's from an old architecture that didn't have any built-in decoding. Ideally, we'd have one new renderer in core.xhtml that extends TreeRenderer