Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi 2010/5/11 Jakob Korherr > Hi, > > However this also means that custom component libraries (e.g. Trinidad) > that have ClientBehaviorHolder-components have to implement the logic to > detect and render jsf.js on their renderers too, right? > > Can we do something better here or is this a spec

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi, However this also means that custom component libraries (e.g. Trinidad) that have ClientBehaviorHolder-components have to implement the logic to detect and render jsf.js on their renderers too, right? Can we do something better here or is this a spec problem/issue? Regards, Jakob 2010/5/10

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Wow, thank you for the clarification. Leonardo Uribe schrieb: Hi 2010/5/10 Ganesh mailto:gan...@j4fry.org>> Hi Leo, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing: The point Andrew and me where making is that it could be good to render jsf.js inline for f:ajax and and custom

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi 2010/5/10 Ganesh > Hi Leo, > > I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing: The point Andrew and me > where making is that it could be good to render jsf.js inline for f:ajax and > and custom behaviours if no h:head is present. Was this what you where > talking about? > > Yes, the conditi

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi Leo, I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing: The point Andrew and me where making is that it could be good to render jsf.js inline for f:ajax and and custom behaviours if no h:head is present. Was this what you where talking about? Best regards, Ganesh Leonardo Uribe schrieb: H

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi 2010/5/9 Jakob Korherr > Hi Leo, Ganesh, > > Yes, good approach, Leo :) > > However I think we should do what Ganesh proposed, that means we should > fall back to an inline rendering of jsf.js if h:head is not present in > addition to adding a FacesMessage and/or log entry. > > The algorithm

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi 2010/5/9 Ganesh > Hi Leo, > > +1, good approach! > > 1 question: Why do 1.+2. require a h:head to be present while 3.-5. render > jsf.js inline? Wouldn't it be possible to *always* try and push it to h:head > and if h:head is not defined *always* fall back to inline? > > That's the idea. In f

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi Leo, Ganesh, Yes, good approach, Leo :) However I think we should do what Ganesh proposed, that means we should fall back to an inline rendering of jsf.js if h:head is not present in addition to adding a FacesMessage and/or log entry. The problem, Ganesh, with pushing it to h:head is, that th

Re: [core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi Leo, +1, good approach! 1 question: Why do 1.+2. require a h:head to be present while 3.-5. render jsf.js inline? Wouldn't it be possible to *always* try and push it to h:head and if h:head is not defined *always* fall back to inline? Best regards, Ganesh Leonardo Uribe schrieb: Hi Chec

[core] conditions to render jsf.js script

Hi Checking some code related to client behavior api, I notice that it is not very clear the conditions to render jsf.js script on a page. Right now we have an open issue (see MYFACES-2687) but we need to discuss this one first before solve it. In few words, myfaces is doing the following: 1. I