Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-09 Thread Thomas Spiegl
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > +1 very good idea! > > > Are those +1 due to the fact that you think that Orchestra is not the > best place where such a component is located (which I understood), or is > it that this component is still miss

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-07 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! > +1 very good idea! > Are those +1 due to the fact that you think that Orchestra is not the best place where such a component is located (which I understood), or is it that this component is still missunderstood ( :-( ) ? Fact is, that this component is a great timesaver when it comes to bu

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-07 Thread Thomas Spiegl
+1 very good idea! On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Manfred Geiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, +1 on moving dynaform to sandbox. > > the annotation stuff seems stable and there are many people out there > who would like it to see this dings in the official maven repo. > > --Manfred > > >

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-05 Thread Manfred Geiler
yes, +1 on moving dynaform to sandbox. the annotation stuff seems stable and there are many people out there who would like it to see this dings in the official maven repo. --Manfred On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > >> > 2) release of orches

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-05 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! >> > 2) release of orchestra-core15-1.0 >> >> We're working on it, but there's quite a lot of effort still needed. It >> all works (and is being used in production) but needs a lot of polishing >> before a stable API can be declared. Probably a couple of months away.. >> > Really month

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread Thomas Spiegl
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:24 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:38 +0100, Thomas Spiegl wrote: > > Hi orchestra team, > > > > just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks > > for your effort! > > Great - thanks for the feedback. > > Di

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread simon
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:38 +0100, Thomas Spiegl wrote: > Hi orchestra team, > > just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks > for your effort! Great - thanks for the feedback. Did you use the persistence stuff, or just the plain conversation-scoping? > > Are there

Re: [orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi orchestra team, > > just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks > for your effort! yep, works great! > > Are there any plans to release orchestra-core-1.1? > > When looking through th

[orchestra] plans

2008-03-04 Thread Thomas Spiegl
Hi orchestra team, just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks for your effort! Are there any plans to release orchestra-core-1.1? When looking through the project I was missing ... 1) download link for orchestra-core-1.0 on http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html 2) r