Has anyone else looked at the apt format? It's more like a wiki
markup than xml.
The xdocs format is transformable, but the apt format isn't. We can
easily convert to apt, but not the other way around.
Seems like we'd lose a lot of work (or be creating a lot of work) the
next time we switch d
I'm curious about this too after having spent the time to convert
10 - 15 pages. The APT format is very limited. For example, I don't
know of a way to insert images into a table. I'm sure there are a
million other examples like this.
James
On Thu Mar 2 9:39 , "Mike Kienenberger" sent:
>Has an
Hey James,
I do appreciate your effort you've put into this, and it's not any
reflection on your work.
I also think the APT format is going to be limited, whereas an XML
format is in theory going to allow us to do anything that the
underlying media will support (in this case, html).
Also, I'm no
APT is nice and simple but I agree its limited. I was thinking we
should switch back to xdoc where it makes sense. It might be nice to
have a "download box" on the rhs of the page like like the maven home
page has.
Sean
On 3/2/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey James,
>
> I
