You're right, Gerhard. Furthermore we now have a spi package in impl (for
the JBoss integration) and I think this is the best place to put it. I will
open a JIRA issue, do some prototyping and provide a patch soon.
Regards,
Jakob
2010/8/13 Gerhard
> the mentioned approach is quite similar to yo
the mentioned approach is quite similar to your initial suggestion -
it just uses different terms and you have one property per config entry
(which allows to use it in a typesafe way). -> if a manager impl. would be
possible - this approach should be possible as well.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.
For this work properly we would have to provide an abstract config class,
but we can only do that in myfaces-impl. However I think it's not a good
idea to require myfaces-impl beeing a compile-dependency, impl should always
be a runtime-dependency.
Although I really like the idea of having a types
i would prefer something like [1]
it allows
- a default implementation which could implement the mentioned behavior
- a typesafe config
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://home.base.be/vt692569/blogs/2010-07-13.html
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Jakob Korherr wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Talking to some users of MyFaces, we found out that it would be really nice
> to be able to have web.xml-settings depending on the current project stage.
> For example you want to have different error pages for Development and
>
Hi guys,
Talking to some users of MyFaces, we found out that it would be really nice
to be able to have web.xml-settings depending on the current project stage.
For example you want to have different error pages for Development and
Production.
Imagine there is the config parameter org.apache.myfa
