On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:06:04 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org said:
MW Hi Jan-Kees,
MW thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like to see something like this.
MW Sounds (to me) very useful...
Note that there is a precedent for doing this kind of discovery without
requiring a Java
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Ed Burns ed.bu...@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:06:04 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org said:
MW Hi Jan-Kees,
MW thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like to see something like this.
MW Sounds (to me) very useful...
Note that there is a
On Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:29:22 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org said:
MW On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Ed Burns ed.bu...@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:06:04 -0700, Matthias Wessendorf
mat...@apache.org said:
MW Hi Jan-Kees,
MW thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like
Hi Jan-Kees,
thanks for creating this ticket. I'd like to see something like this.
Sounds (to me) very useful...
-M
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Jan-Kees van Andel
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to be complete...
Hi Jan-Kees,
for now, our last ressort ist code duplication. For the future, you
should file an issue against the spec, I would say.
regards,
Martin
On 10/25/09, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey (CC MyFaces Dev),
For MyFaces, I have implemented the first version of
Hey (CC MyFaces Dev),
For MyFaces, I have implemented the first version of Bean Validation
support. But my implementation had a TCK issue, because I had some
non-specified public fields. These fields indicated the runtime
availability of some libraries.
See:
