JSF core TCK - non-javax classes allowed in api jar?

Hi All, A thought just occurred to me. The JSF core spec license (and TCK) require that we do not add any class to the javax.faces namespace which is not in the spec. This is fair, as doing so would confuse users and lead to unportable code. However this limitation has caused some real pain, as

Re: JSF core TCK - non-javax classes allowed in api jar?

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, A thought just occurred to me. The JSF core spec license (and TCK) require that we do not add any class to the javax.faces namespace which is not in the spec. This is fair, as doing so would confuse users and

Re: JSF core TCK - non-javax classes allowed in api jar?

On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, A thought just occurred to me. The JSF core spec license (and TCK) require that we do not add any class to

Re: JSF core TCK - non-javax classes allowed in api jar?

Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, A thought just occurred to me. The JSF core spec license (and TCK) require that we do not add any class to the javax.faces namespace which is not in the spec. This is fair, as