But shouldn't that be handled via the JSF EG?
Such a behaviour would need to be written in the spec to be reliable, isn't?
Yes, I agree, it shouldn't be left to implementations.
javax.faces.component.EditableValueHolder.resetValue() and/or listener
like
Hi Cagatay,
This is the exact same issue a customer described to me a year ago.
The result was this blog post [1], but unfortunately not more.
I totally agree with you that this stuff should be easier to use than
it is now! I am describing some ideas to solve this problem in the
blog post (e.g.
Sounds like a good idea.
But shouldn't that be handled via the JSF EG?
Such a behaviour would need to be written in the spec to be reliable, isn't?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 5/30/11, Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.com
Subject: Clear
Hi,
javax.faces.component.EditableValueHolder.resetValue() and/or listener
like
http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad/trinidad-api/tagdoc/tr_resetActionListener.html
does not solve it?
Kočičák
Mark Struberg píše v Po 30. 05. 2011 v 13:19 +0100:
Sounds like a good idea.
But shouldn't that be
