Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-07 Thread Alexander Kazachonak
There I am trying to elaborate on what I want to have done in summer. Really I had little time to work on this text. And now I am ill and have a temperature of 37.6 C :( Not the best state to think about such things. The full proposal I will compose and send later. As for Faces Freeway I think th

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
Alex, you'll need to have your proposal setup until 8th of May the latest - don't forget on that deadline ;) regards, Martin On 5/4/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Martin! > there is nothing to be said against taking on Alexander for a SoC > project with his proposal, and t

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Martin! > there is nothing to be said against taking on Alexander for a SoC > project with his proposal, and then together decide on how much of > this fits into Faces Freeway, and let Alexander adopt the rest. > > what do you think? Yes, for sure, thats what I wanted :-) Ciao, Mario

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-04 Thread Martin Marinschek
Mario, there is nothing to be said against taking on Alexander for a SoC project with his proposal, and then together decide on how much of this fits into Faces Freeway, and let Alexander adopt the rest. what do you think? regards, Martin On 5/4/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-04 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Alexander! > But more interesting task is to extract data straight from the > business layer. Data can come not only from RDBMS, but from > web-services or other place. I've been thinking that we can provide > access to data model for UI through general interface like extended > Maps and Lists.

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-04 Thread Alexander Kazachonak
; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 11:57 AM >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Summer of Code >>> >>> JSF *really* needs this agility with CRUD scaffolding. I've been thinking >&

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-04 Thread Werner Punz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > I've been chatting with Gavin about this for some time-- the code generation > vs. dynamic generation for scaffolding. I believe the tooling coming from > seam/hbm is all code generation where I would think there would be advantages > to having component sets that d

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-03 Thread Enrique Medina
Have you also taken a look at Rumba framework?http://www.rumbaframework.orgOn 5/3/06, Alexander Kazachonak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. It is not a comlete proposal, but I rather want to know your opinionon the project i'm working on. It is not straight myfaces codebase related,but you seem a

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-03 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! > http://facesfreeway.l3x.net/xref/index.html > The xref is not up-to-date, please use the svn http://l3x.net/svn/facesfreeway/trunk/ to skim through the source. Ciao, Mario

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-03 Thread Mario Ivankovits
s Byrne >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 11:57 AM >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org >>> Subject: RE: Summer of Code >>> >>> JSF *r

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-03 Thread jacob
The last I >checked, this was in alpha. > >Dennis Byrne > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2006 11:57 AM >>To: dev@myfaces.apache.org >>Subject: RE: Summer of Code >> >>

Re: Summer of Code

2006-05-03 Thread Dennis Byrne
Wednesday, May 3, 2006 11:57 AM >To: dev@myfaces.apache.org >Subject: RE: Summer of Code > >JSF *really* needs this agility with CRUD scaffolding. I've been thinking >though with JEE 5 and the EJB 3 adoption, that you couldn't produce something >similar to your proposal

RE: Summer of Code

2006-05-03 Thread jacob
JSF *really* needs this agility with CRUD scaffolding. I've been thinking though with JEE 5 and the EJB 3 adoption, that you couldn't produce something similar to your proposal that works off of pure EJB 3 metadata define the pages. Something like: This way, you could have your EJB 3