Re: Wildcard patterns in javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES parameter

2008-02-26 Thread Danny Robinson
Paul, Not sure I agree that the approach violates the spec, given it would be 'off' by default (it seems similar to Trinidad's existing customization of the 'client' state saving setting), but I do see your point on documentation. For sure your approach could also work. I'll take a look at this

Wildcard patterns in javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES parameter

2008-02-25 Thread Danny Robinson
Guys, I don't think it's possible to dynamically specify wildcard config loading patterns for JSF currently. However, most all other frameworks today seem to be able to handle something similar for loading files by naming/location conventions. I know JSF will pick-up META-INF/faces-confg.xml

Re: Wildcard patterns in javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES parameter

2008-02-25 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi Danny, yes!!! regards, Martin On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, I don't think it's possible to dynamically specify wildcard config loading patterns for JSF currently. However, most all other frameworks today seem to be able to handle

Re: Wildcard patterns in javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES parameter

2008-02-25 Thread simon
Sounds like a good idea to me too. On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 18:29 +0100, Martin Marinschek wrote: Hi Danny, yes!!! regards, Martin On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Guys, I don't think it's possible to dynamically specify wildcard config

Re: Wildcard patterns in javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES parameter

2008-02-25 Thread Paul Spencer
Danny, Sounds like a good idea. I am not sure if the non-spec compliant use of the parameter javax.faces.CONFIG_FILES in conjunction with a parameter not defined by the spec, like org.apache.myfaces.ENABLE_WILD_CARD_IN_CONFIG_FILES, would violate the spec. At the very least it would