Travis Reeder schrieb:
I'm all for anything that makes component writing easier, it's pretty
complex right now, so many places to make mistakes and makes it hard for
a newbie to start making components.
Actually there are two areas which components probably have to tackle
api wise.
a) The
getScrolling() _javascript_ function is not being generated in the portal environment?
Is this function being generated by the extension filter?
I haven't reviewed those discussions. Are any of these issues so
problematic that we don't want to release for several weeks? That's
the real decision here. I agree that its a bit awkward to have to
configure the logging with shared_impl and shared_tomahawk but
ultimately I think the benefits
On 3/28/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig, the Shale Tiger extensions are a good startin point, I read thedocs, and liked what I saw. (I also highly recommend Seam which drivesannotations to the extreme)Yep ... good stuff there too.
Anyway, having had to hack components again for an
make runnable with weblogic
---
Key: TOBAGO-53
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-53
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Udo Schnurpfeil
Assigned to: Udo Schnurpfeil
--
This message is automatically
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-220?page=comments#action_12372254
]
Frank Russo commented on TOMAHAWK-220:
--
Also: org/apache/myfaces/renderkit/html/HtmlHiddenRenderer
Sandbox has many dependencies on MyFaces-Impl
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-220?page=comments#action_12372255
]
Frank Russo commented on TOMAHAWK-220:
--
Also: org/apache/myfaces/shared_impl/renderkit/html/HtmlRenderer
Hopefully there aren't too many more...
Sandbox has many
I am trying to migrate an application based on myfaces 1.1.0
from tomcat to websphere 6 with no success.
I get an nullPointerException
[3/29/06 14:12:20:888 CEST] 0049
ServletWrappe E SRVE0068E: Could
not invoke the service() method on servlet Controller Servlet. Exception thrown
I wonder how many users actually disable javascript? All of the non
programmers I know seem to have it enabled when I surf at their
houses. I can't imagine writing a very decent webapp without
javascript. I know its an issue for some projects but I wonder if
management isn't being unreasonable
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
I was constrained in the stuff so far by what could be accomplished at
runtime -- and there's no way to define a tag library on the fly at
that point. But what you're describing could certainly be done by
processing annotations at compile time instead (using apt or
Yes and it is generated for each of the subprojects now
(http://myfaces.apache.org/api/dependencies.html). The top level page
is actually just supposed to be a html only project so I'm not sure
why there are *any* dependencies. Probably a mistake in the POM.
One thing that I would like to
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I was constrained in the stuff so far by what could be accomplished at
runtime -- and there's no way to define a tag library on the fly at
that point. But what you're describing could certainly be done by
processing annotations at compile time instead (using apt or
Websphere 6.0 loads IBM JSF jar files during the startup. You may need to
remove them to avoid conflicts. Though I removed those jars and changing to
Parent_Last, I was unable to run the sample apps on WAS6.0 fully. If this
app is a production app, then good luck to you and let me know if you
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-53?page=all ]
Udo Schnurpfeil resolved TOBAGO-53:
---
Fix Version: 1.0.7
Resolution: Fixed
weblogic uses zip: instead of jar: as protocoll
to load a file the url must be prefixed with file:
(this
On 3/28/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig, the Shale Tiger extensions are a good startin point, I read the
docs, and liked what I saw. (I also highly recommend Seam which drives
annotations to the extreme)
Anyway, having had to hack components again for an extende period of
time
On 3/29/06, Jacob Hookom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I was constrained in the stuff so far by what could be accomplished at
runtime -- and there's no way to define a tag library on the fly at
that point. But what you're describing could certainly be done by
On 3/29/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
I was constrained in the stuff so far by what could be accomplished at
runtime -- and there's no way to define a tag library on the fly at
that point. But what you're describing could certainly be done by
On 3/29/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travis Reeder schrieb:
I'm all for anything that makes component writing easier, it's pretty
complex right now, so many places to make mistakes and makes it hard for
a newbie to start making components.
Actually there are two areas which
Do we need to address the sandbox dependencies on impl before a
release?We'll probably need to move some things from impl to
shared to fix them. I'm pretty sure that I've identified the classes
involved in the following issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-220
-Mike
On
No I don't think this has to be resolved right now. It will just mean
some stuff will be in the core that won't be there the next time
around. Especially if the dependencies are sandbox only I don't see
the need to slow things down. Do you?
Sena
On 3/29/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/29/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No I don't think this has to be resolved right now. It will just mean
some stuff will be in the core that won't be there the next time
around. Especially if the dependencies are sandbox only I don't see
the need to slow things down. Do
Adam Winer schrieb:
On 3/29/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan schrieb:
I was constrained in the stuff so far by what could be accomplished at
runtime -- and there's no way to define a tag library on the fly at
that point. But what you're describing could certainly be
Adam Winer schrieb:
On 3/28/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig, the Shale Tiger extensions are a good startin point, I read the
docs, and liked what I saw. (I also highly recommend Seam which drives
annotations to the extreme)
Anyway, having had to hack components again for an
Sylvain Vieujot schrieb:
I don't think we should rule out the use of annotations for navigation
rules.
Even if navigation rules are tied to the presentation layer, so are bean
names.
Actually I do not think there is a need for that.
There is a more elegant solution to the problem, than using
Adam Winer schrieb:
Is the code reduction you're noting there from eliminating the JSP tag
code?
Mostly yes, the tld definitions and taglib binding class is pure jsp,
there also could be a cut down on the faces-config parts
and standard behavior like save stating that way.
So it probably is
So does anyone have any objections to my new branch creation? There
is certainly no harm (we can always abandon the branch again) but I'd
rather not go through with the work if we aren't committed to
releasing ASAP.
Sean
On 3/29/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/29/06, Sean
Nothing that I remember. However, JIRA is down right now.
I'm willing to test a release, and I know we have a lot of facelets
people waiting for a stable fix for duplicate id problems.
On 3/29/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So does anyone have any objections to my new branch
From: "Adam Winer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 3/29/06, Werner Punz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: Travis Reeder schrieb:I'm all for anything that makes component writing easier, it's prettycomplex right now, so many places to make mistakes and makes it hard fora newbie to start making
Hi!
So does anyone have any objections to my new branch creation?
I am fine with it. We use a current snapshot in our production
environment and it works.
---
Mario
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-220?page=comments#action_12372290
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-220:
Right, I only listed the components with dependencies, but each of those
components has several dependencies (like
MyFaces web site front page should start with Project Info expanded
-
Key: MYFACES-1193
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1193
Project: MyFaces Core
Type: Improvement
Reporter:
A custom navigation handler might be more elegant, but it's also more complex as you have to write this navigation handler, and learn a new way of configuring your application (even if it's simple). So maybe it's a good thing to have, but I would not take this as a reason not to have
Hello,
I would like to move the Tobago resources from Incubator to MyFaces.
The source should be moved to /repos/asf/myfaces/tobago and the site
should be integrated as subproject of MyFaces.
Any objections?
Regards
Bernd
--
Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH - Software Development
The annotations plugin we wrote and we propose to commit to a sandbox
1.5 was ment at first to replace the jsf xdoclet plugin with an
annotations plugin as it's quite hard to get this xdoclet plugin work
with maven 2.
Tobago has already some annotations stuff. Can we share the efforts?
We
I tested WAS 6.0 with the upcomming MyFaces 1.1.2.
1) Remove Jsf API and Jsf Impl from AppServer/lib dir
AppServer/lib/jsf-api.jar
AppServer/lib/ws-jsf.jar
2) Copy the MyFaces JSF Api to AppServer/lib dir
myfaces-api.jar
3) Copy commons classes to AppServer/lib dir
commons-beanutils.jar
mvn install cannot be invoked multiple times
Key: MYFACES-1194
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1194
Project: MyFaces Core
Type: Bug
Components: build process
Reporter: Mike Kienenberger
mvn
Sure, that's on my TODO list ;)
On 3/30/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Thomas,
Can you add this to the Wiki under the appserver config link so we can
point users to it?
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Installation_and_Configuration
On 3/29/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL
Another thing I've on my harddisk is the Facelet-Taglib generator. It
generates the necessary facelets definitions for jsf-core, jsf-impl,
tomahawk and sandbox. The Maven plugin is ready, but needs to be
integrated in the MyFaces build.
Any volunteers here on this list to who can complete this
On 3/29/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another thing I've on my harddisk is the Facelet-Taglib generator. It
generates the necessary facelets definitions for jsf-core, jsf-impl,
tomahawk and sandbox. The Maven plugin is ready, but needs to be
integrated in the MyFaces build.
Any
it's the Facelet-Taglib files being generated. No Facelet/EL jars are
needed therefore.
It's the xml, you can download from our
wiki:http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Use_Facelets_with_Tomahawk
The file on our wiki page is outdated and inconsistent. I think the
first step moving towards facelets is
On 3/29/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's the Facelet-Taglib files being generated. No Facelet/EL jars are
needed therefore.
It's the xml, you can download from our
wiki:http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Use_Facelets_with_Tomahawk
The file on our wiki page is outdated and
has the incubation process completed?
+1 then
On 3/29/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I would like to move the Tobago resources from Incubator to MyFaces.
The source should be moved to /repos/asf/myfaces/tobago and the site
should be integrated as subproject of MyFaces.
Some definitions are complete, some are not. (eg. jscookMenu will not
work, cause the render-type is missing)
Yes, just want to generate the files as a first step. We had a
discussion a few month ago about facelet support within MyFaces. I
don't remember the output, if there was one. So how can
On 3/29/06, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some definitions are complete, some are not. (eg. jscookMenu will not
work, cause the render-type is missing)
True, but by keeping it on the wiki, it's trivial to fix each of these
problems as we come across them. Maybe at this point in time,
I'm on windows, and I'm trying to find a way to move
IMPL:
src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/application/ComponentNotFoundException.java
to
SANDBOX:
src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/custom/ajax/api/ComponentNotFoundException.java
without losing history.
I don't see any way to do it from
If you drag it from one folder to another, right click on the folder you
dragged it to, and go to team - commit, it preserves history.
I know, not very intuitive but it does work ;)
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
On 3/29/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you drag it from one folder to another, right click on the folder you
dragged it to, and go to team - commit, it preserves history.
I know, not very intuitive but it does work ;)
I'm assuming you mean from Eclipse.
That's what I did
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1121?page=comments#action_12372348
]
Dave commented on MYFACES-1121:
---
This is an urgent issue.
Like many people, I need to upgrade to JBoss 4.0.4 to use EJB 3.0 RC5 new
features, and take advantage of bug fixes
I'm not sure why, but the history has always been preserved for me even though
it looks as though you are literally deleting and adding a different file.
This is how it is on projects here at my day job and w/ MyFaces repo ( w/
Eclipse ).
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Mike
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1121?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger closed MYFACES-1121:
--
Resolution: Duplicate
This looks like a duplicate of TOMAHAWK-201 which I fixed on March 23rd.
FacesContext.getCurrentContext is null
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-217?page=all ]
Mike Kienenberger closed TOMAHAWK-217:
--
Duplicate of MYFACES-827, fixed on 11/15/2005
HtmlPopupRenderer does not render facet's direct child
sure. It would be a good thing to revive commons for that, right?
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/06, Bernd Bohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The annotations plugin we wrote and we propose to commit to a sandbox
1.5 was ment at first to replace the jsf xdoclet plugin with an
annotations plugin as
Hi Jurgen
I tried to update this issue but i can't, the service is unavailable.
Well, this error happened again, we used the schedule component in a
Critical Production Application, everything was fine until today, the appl
just doesn`t work, but if I change the server date to yesterday the appl
We use a snapshot as well, all fine for us.
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
So does anyone have any objections to my new branch creation?
I am fine with it. We use a current snapshot in our production
environment and it works.
---
Mario
--
54 matches
Mail list logo
