Re: current12 shared_core classpath issue

Hi Dennis,It is in the shared, the impl is fine.Pretty fresh, I've checked out yesterday. Don't you have the same issue?CagatayOn 7/12/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is this in core/impl and/or shared ?OK, so this information was in the subject :)How fresh is the check out?Dennis

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1363) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module -- Key: MYFACES-1363 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363 Project: MyFaces Core Type: Bug Components: JSR-252 Reporter: Dennis Byrne Assigned to: Dennis Byrne

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1363) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363?page=all ] Dennis Byrne updated MYFACES-1363: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module -- Key: MYFACES-1363

Re: current12 shared_core classpath issue

Thanks for bringing this up. There is a problem ... http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363 I will leave the rest to you ;) Dennis Byrne -Original Message- From: Cagatay Civici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 03:25 AM To: 'MyFaces Development'

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1363) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363?page=comments#action_12420541 ] Dennis Byrne commented on MYFACES-1363: --- BTW, patch if for the file current/shared/pom.xml API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

Re: current12 shared_core classpath issue

The pom.xml needed patching, thanks, now the dependencies are fixed, only thing remaining is to fix the compilation error:)CagatayOn 7/12/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Thanks for bringing this up.There is a problem ... http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363I will leave the

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-535) Schedule Tooltip is broken in Internet Explorer

Schedule Tooltip is broken in Internet Explorer --- Key: TOMAHAWK-535 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-535 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Components: Schedule Versions: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT,

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1261) JSR-252 Issue #93: Added escape flag indicating the text of UISelectItem should be escaped when rendering.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1261?page=all ] Çagatay Çivici updated MYFACES-1261: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) JSR-252 Issue #93: Added escape flag indicating the text of UISelectItem should be escaped when rendering.

Client Validation Design Discussion

Hi,I'm about to finish my work on the client validation and have faced with a design dilemma here.There are two method getJsFunction() and getParams() that must be implemented by extended validators so which design seem more convenient? * Using an IClientSideValidator which will be implemented by

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

It seems to me that both ways lead to inheritance :) I think that an interface should be used, especially if the *only* goal of an abstract base class would be defining those two abstract methods. This is also more flexible because multiple interfaces inheritance is allowed: suppose you have a

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

Hi Cagatay! There are two method getJsFunction() and getParams() that must be implemented by extended validators so which design seem more convenient? * Using an IClientSideValidator which will be implemented by extended validators marking them capable of doing validation at client side. or

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-536) Data from inputText within popup is not saved

Data from inputText within popup is not saved - Key: TOMAHAWK-536 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-536 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Components: Popup Versions: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-537) commandLin in table does not work

commandLin in table does not work - Key: TOMAHAWK-537 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-537 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Versions: 1.1.3 Reporter: Michael Lipp As simple as that: put a

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

Hi,Yes, using the validatorbase seems a better way in this case. Also as you said, it would be better to remove the abstract signature since it'll break other validators like in sandbox.One more discussion topic, the client validation is turned on/off via a context parameter,

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

Hi Cagatay! One more discussion topic, the client validation is turned on/off via a context parameter, org.apache.myfaces.ENABLE_CLIENT_VALIDATION, Do you think validators should override this global setting via an attribute like client? client=true|false - yes, I think this will be a nice

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-537) commandLin in table does not work

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-537?page=comments#action_12420594 ] Michael Lipp commented on TOMAHAWK-537: --- Oh, and i'm not the only one having problems here, see http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=549675start=45 ,

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1258) JSR-252 Issue #160: Added and specified ResponseWriter.writeText method that takes a UIComponent argument.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1258?page=comments#action_12420602 ] Çagatay Çivici commented on MYFACES-1258: - This currently breaks the build because ResponseWriterImpl does not implement it. JSR-252 Issue #160: Added and

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-535) Schedule Tooltip is broken in Internet Explorer

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-535?page=comments#action_12420610 ] Peter Mahoney commented on TOMAHAWK-535: Is it the case that no tooltips work, or is it only ones containing certain characters in the text? TOMAHAWK-487 fixed a

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-535) Schedule Tooltip is broken in Internet Explorer

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-535?page=comments#action_12420613 ] Nina Hintringer commented on TOMAHAWK-535: -- No tooltips work in IE, there are no certain characters and no line breaks in the text. Schedule Tooltip is broken

[jira] Updated: (MYFACES-1025) panelGrid does always render a border-attribute

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1025?page=all ] Çagatay Çivici updated MYFACES-1025: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) panelGrid does always render a border-attribute ---

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-538) dataScoller displays wrong page after increasing row count on dataTable resulting in page count which is smaller than last displayed page.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-538?page=comments#action_12420628 ] Torsten Krah commented on TOMAHAWK-538: --- Addition: Made my own Renderer and changed setVariables to fix the wrong values - works fine. The only thing i cannot get

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-538) dataScoller displays wrong page after increasing row count on dataTable resulting in page count which is smaller than last displayed page.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-538?page=comments#action_12420635 ] Torsten Krah commented on TOMAHAWK-538: --- Addition: The scroller gets rendered correct - but the dataTable not. Using the scrollers last or first button, the

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-1364) ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception when restoring state on a custom component

ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception when restoring state on a custom component -- Key: MYFACES-1364 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1364 Project: MyFaces Core Type: Bug

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1364) ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception when restoring state on a custom component

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1364?page=comments#action_12420657 ] Ionut S commented on MYFACES-1364: -- You can count +10 here (10 people in my team need this bug solved) ArrayIndexOutOfBounds exception when restoring state on a custom

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

I think that having a ValidatorBase is reasonable enough, but thatit's critical to make the real API an interface in this case. We can'trequire that everyone on the planet extend from ValidatorBase ifthey want to take part in this. For one example, what if I download a third-party validator, and

Testing for CoreRelease114

I temporarily modified the Shale build environment to use 1.1.4 instead of 1.1.1, and was able to successfully build and run all the unit tests and integration tests (meaning I could deploy apps and run through some basic exercises on some of the standard components). One thing I would note in the

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1363) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363?page=comments#action_12420703 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1363: - this guy makes now continuum fail (lack of 1.2 api dep) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

Exception in 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT after validation error while using t:panelTabbedPane serverSideTabSwitch=true

(Tomahawk 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT, MyFaces 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT) I have a Tabbed panel with 3 tabs. If a validation error is displayed on the current tab, then the following exception report will be returned when a another tab is selected and serverSideTabSwitch=true. javax.faces.FacesException: Value is no

Re: Testing for CoreRelease114

Thanks Craig, did the same just for the Trinidad Podling. Worked too :) the maven group id is since 1.1.2. -Matthias On 7/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I temporarily modified the Shale build environment to use 1.1.4 instead of 1.1.1, and was able to successfully build and

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-539) The tooltip displayed by t:message displaye the summary instead of the detail message

The tooltip displayed by t:message displaye the summary instead of the detail message --- Key: TOMAHAWK-539 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-539 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk

Ids in 1.1.3 and 1.1.4

Hi, Is there any reason why the UIComponentTag appends jsp to all the component ids in 1.1.3/1.1.4? Any chance this can be removed for 1.1.4 so that it returns the same ids as UIViewRoot.createUniqueId() and the RI? Thanks, h

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-540) t:panelNavigation2 layout attribute documentation is incorrect

t:panelNavigation2 layout attribute documentation is incorrect - Key: TOMAHAWK-540 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-540 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Components: Panel

Relative to Nagivation, which component shoud be used for new development?

Which navigation components should be used for new development? t:panelNavigation or t:panelNavigation2 ? t:commandNavigation, or t:commandNavigation2, or t:navigationMenuItem? Paul Spencer

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

Hi! For one example, what if I download a third-party validator, and want to add client-side validation support to it? So, +1 for an interface. I dont think this is the best use-case as you still have to change the original validator code (implement the interface). To achieve this without the

Re: [jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1363) API 1.1.1 dependency for shared module

I've also mentioned about it here;http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1258On 7/12/06, Matthias Weßendorf (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1363?page=comments#action_12420703 ]Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1363:

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

Everyone brews its own soup here, as we can see ... but ok, I wont complain about a interface as it allows a better flexibility if we think we should provide a framework for others too. I saw this http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 during my daily blog reading, yesterday I'd also be -1

Re: Ids in 1.1.3 and 1.1.4

Hey Howard, you mean stuff like ? table id=_idJsp0:data ... Was introduced in Revision 359449 see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=359449 I can't tell you much about that. sorry! -Matt On 7/12/06, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Is there any reason why

Re: Ids in 1.1.3 and 1.1.4

From: "Matthias Wessendorf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hey Howard, you mean stuff like ? Was introduced in "Revision 359449" see http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=359449 I can't tell you much about that. sorry! I did some research on this for Shale Clay. Clay has to

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

On 7/12/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! For one example, what if I download a third-party validator, and want to add client-side validation support to it? So, +1 for an interface.I dont think this is the best use-case as you still have to change the original validator code

Relative to Nagivation, which component shoud be used for new development?

Which navigation components should be used for new development? t:panelNavigation or t:panelNavigation2 ? t:commandNavigation, or t:commandNavigation2, or t:navigationMenuItem? Paul Spencer

Re: Client Validation Design Discussion

On 7/12/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,Although I fancy the interface design first because of the flexibility, since enabling all of the myfaces extended validators to do validation at client is necessary, validatorbase still seems the better way. Validatorbase is also a nice place

RE: Client Validation Design Discussion

I have developed my own Client validation framework for the company I work for and I will second the notion of what Trinidad/ADF is doing. I went a similar approach, although I did mine slightly differently. We have a requirement to support multiple mediums including desktop, PDA, etc. So,

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-541) Tomahawk TLD error

Tomahawk TLD error -- Key: TOMAHAWK-541 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-541 Project: MyFaces Tomahawk Type: Bug Components: Schedule Versions: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT Environment: I am using WindowsXP and running on Weblogic

Re: Exception in 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT after validation error while using t:panelTabbedPane serverSideTabSwitch=true

Hey Paul, I understand that you are annoyed about the feedback here on the questions. I haven't used that component. Can't say anything about. May the others help ... Sorry, Matthias On 7/12/06, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (Tomahawk 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT, MyFaces 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT) I have a

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-541) Tomahawk TLD error

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-541?page=comments#action_12420745 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on TOMAHAWK-541: - this is not the only one, which is broken. thanks! Tomahawk TLD error -- Key:

Re: Exception in 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT after validation error while using t:panelTabbedPane serverSideTabSwitch=true

Matthias, I am not annoyed, but sometimes a little frustrated :) Paul Spencer Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Hey Paul, I understand that you are annoyed about the feedback here on the questions. I haven't used that component. Can't say anything about. May the others help ... Sorry, Matthias On

Re: Release 1.1.4

Snapshots of the core distribution assemblies are available: * http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/core-1.1.x/ Please check them (I haven't...) and let us know if they'll be okay for the release. More info here: http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/CoreRelease114 -- Wendy

[Renderers] HtmlRenderer / CoreRenderer ( and XhtmlRenderer)

Hey, I introduced three helper methods to shared's HtmlRenderer (renderId(), getClientId(), shouldRender()). These methods are taken CoreRenderer (Apache Trinidad Podling). I ported some Renderer's to use renderId() instead of using rw.writeAttribute(...) I figured out, that some Renderer's

Re: Ids in 1.1.3 and 1.1.4

The problem is that there is a bug in the spec here.If you called createUniqueId in earlier MyFaces versions, you would receive a unique id, but only unique for one request. On the next request, the sequence would be restarted. This would make working with dynamic component creation exceptionally