Re: Revised Webapps Proposal

2005-03-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi all, I just did the following to our web apps example -moved webapps/examples/src to webapps/src -moved webapps/examples/web to webapps/examples -created webapps/simple/ that contains Sean's simple web app files -created a new build.xml inside of build/simple-webapp I guess, there is some work

Re: Revised Webapps Proposal

2005-03-12 Thread Sean Schofield
Nice work Matthias. I am out of town this weekend due to a family emergency (everything is ok now.) I will take a look shortly and see if I can't work up some of those improvements to the build files. sean On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:58:01 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi

Re: Tree2

2005-03-12 Thread Oliver Rossmueller
Sean Schofield wrote: snip Yes you are repeating yourself over and over on this point. I do not see how tree2 has changed the basic requirments of the user. You keep saying that I am against TreeModel and for TreeNode. That is not the case. Let me try to phrase my argument differently ... You

Re: Tree2

2005-03-12 Thread Sean Schofield
Oliver, You are correct that option 3 is missing in the new tree and that its present in JTree and the current tree. This was not designed to intentionally deprive you of functionality that you need in your application. It didn't really occur to me that tree should support this kind of