Hi!
I know this is not the best timing, but I would like to ask anyway.
Also I havent looked at it in every detail, so I dont know if there is
any technical reason for not doing so.
The question is: Can we move all the AddResource stuff from shared to
tomahawk?
In fact I talk about the whole
The same goes for org.apache.myfaces.shared.webapp.filter.WelcomeFileFilter.
Hello Mario,
WelcomeFileFilter was moved to commons already.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1112
Are you saying this is back in impl ?
Dennis Byrne
+1
Everything that is not in spec (ie MyFaces Extensions) and not needed
by impl should be moved to tomahawk IMO. This way shared module will
slim down. The less we have in shared the less we have dependencies
between impl, shared and tomahawk. And the less will be the pain
with our new project
Hi Dennis!
The same goes for org.apache.myfaces.shared.webapp.filter.WelcomeFileFilter.
WelcomeFileFilter was moved to commons already.
From impl to commons to tomahawk ... ;-)
A long journey for sure :-)
Are you saying this is back in impl ?
not impl, to tomahawk!
---
Mario
Dennis Byrne schrieb:
The same goes for org.apache.myfaces.shared.webapp.filter.WelcomeFileFilter.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1112
JavaScriptDetectorFilter stayed in impl because it depends on
ServletExternalContextImpl .
Does this mean we cant move the
Hi,
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
I know this is not the best timing, but I would like to ask anyway.
Also I havent looked at it in every detail, so I dont know if there is
any technical reason for not doing so.
The question is: Can we move all the AddResource stuff from shared to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-855?page=all ]
updated MYFACES-855:
-
FacesException: Cannot get value for expression '...' when expression is valid
--
Key:
UIColumns does not support java.util.Set
Key: TOMAHAWK-172
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-172
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Bug
Components: Columns
Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Erik
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-172?page=all ]
Erik Jan de Wit updated TOMAHAWK-172:
-
UIColumns does not support java.util.Set
Key: TOMAHAWK-172
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-41?page=comments#action_12368700 ]
Iryna Stetska commented on TOBAGO-41:
-
Actually, we need target attribute for t:toolbarCommand component (which is
rendered to a href=), but having such option for button
How is the testing going? Hopefully people have had a chance to test
tomahawk and the core branch. If so, might I suggest someone does
some TCK testing on the core branch? If possible it would be nice to
release soon. Unfortunately I am on the road this weekend and then
again for a couple of
Hello,
independent of leaving incubator or not,
I would like to setup a release plan for Tobago.
Can every Tobago Team Member add his own wishes or tasks in jira.
Please set the Fix Version/s field to the unreleased version 1.0.7.
Regards
Bernd
--
Dipl.-Ing. Bernd Bohmann - Atanion GmbH -
On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
Just FYI, there is an effort afoot in the Struts community to
separate out the Tiles from any dependencies on the Struts Action
Framework APIs. It's currently in the Struts sandbox, and a bit
stalled due to (a) developer time, and (b)
I just checked the stuff out and looks like the stuff in trunk is
still the old struts stuff, the name spaces are
org.apache.struts.tiles i thought the standalone was o.a.tiles ?
Have i checked the wrong stuff out?
Mark
On 3/3/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 6:12
On 3/3/06, Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked the stuff out and looks like the stuff in trunk isstill the old struts stuff, the name spaces areorg.apache.struts.tiles i thought the standalone was o.a.tiles ?Have i checked the wrong stuff out?
What did you check out? Standalone
On Mar 3, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:What did you check out? Standalone Tiles is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/tiles/ (Is there some documentation that needs to be updated to make this clearer?)Probably :-) I've seen a lot of confusion about the 2
Found it..
On 3/3/06, Mark Lowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just checked the stuff out and looks like the stuff in trunk is
still the old struts stuff, the name spaces are
org.apache.struts.tiles i thought the standalone was o.a.tiles ?
Have i checked the wrong stuff out?
Mark
On 3/3/06,
I have a three day weekend now. Are there areas we should focus on? Where
does one obtain a copy of the TCK?
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2006 08:04 AM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Testing Progress?
How is
BTW, shouldnt it be easily possible to get rid of the dependency to
ServletExternalContextImpl?
Its used just to set a session attribute, no?
I think you are correct. If you don't do this soon (yourself), go ahead and
reopen the issue and I'll take a look at it.
Dennis Byrne
Hi!
BTW, shouldnt it be easily possible to get rid of the dependency to
ServletExternalContextImpl?
Its used just to set a session attribute, no?
I think you are correct. If you don't do this soon (yourself), go ahead and
reopen the issue and I'll take a look at it.
I think I
I think moving to tomahawk is ok by now.
Manfred
On 3/3/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
BTW, shouldnt it be easily possible to get rid of the dependency to
ServletExternalContextImpl?
Its used just to set a session attribute, no?
I think you are correct. If you
Oliver was our resident TCK pro, and he went through quite an ordeal to
get the thing running with MyFaces if my memory serves me. I'm pretty
sure some of the other committers managed to get it working too (it was
a while ago, but I seem to remember that some of the tests were flawed
and needed
schedule component doesn't invoke the action value binding
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-173
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-173
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Bug
Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT
I just tried to deploy the .war created by the maven archtype. On
execution, all you get is a blank screen (no hello world :). Is anyone
else having this problem ?On 3/3/06, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver was our resident TCK pro, and he went through quite an ordeal to
get the thing
Oliver was our resident TCK pro
Apparently one must obtain a license for the test suite. Did he have one for
himself or one for the MyFaces project?
The MyFaces project has a licence. On 3/3/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver was our resident TCK proApparently one must obtain a license for the test suite.Did he have one for himself or one for the MyFaces project?--
Grant Smith
Does MyFaces have a permission to see the code, or just the binary? Who has
the binary?
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2006 01:51 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Testing Progress?
The MyFaces project has a
We have the code. Yes, we have permission :) I'm not 100% sure if it is
for pmc's only, so I will ask that question immediately in the pmc
list. If I get the go-ahead, I'll send you the TCK.On 3/3/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does MyFaces have a permission to see the code, or just the
Enhancement on SubFormRenderer to allow partial form submits using Javascript
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-174
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-174
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type:
schedule component: select available time slots to create new entries
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-175
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-175
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Improvement
JSF XHTML Violation
---
Key: MYFACES-1161
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1161
Project: MyFaces Core
Type: Improvement
Versions: 1.1.1, 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT, 1.1.2, 1.1.3-SNAPSHOT
Environment: Operating Systems: All
Platform:
I have signed and faxed an NDA, per offline dicussion. Thanks.
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2006 02:22 PM
To: 'MyFaces Development'
Subject: Re: Testing Progress?
OK,
So there is red tape involved. You have to sign
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-175?page=comments#action_12368791
]
Jurgen Lust commented on TOMAHAWK-175:
--
I think this type of behaviour is very desirable for the schedule component,
provided that it respects the readonly flag and
_ComponentAttributesMap.getPropertyDescriptor appears to get hung in a HashMap
under peak load.
-
Key: MYFACES-1162
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1162
Hi!
I am nearly finished with refactoring
shared/org.apache.myfaces.shared.renderkit.html.util to
tomahawk/org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.util
Now I have a problem with AddResource.properties.
Can one please direct me how to bundle this file with maven?
Another problem I have is in directory
OK, I got the confirmation they've received it.. stand byOn 3/3/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have signed and faxed an NDA, per offline dicussion.Thanks.Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, March 3, 2006 02:22 PMTo: 'MyFaces
I'm looking at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-169 ( add
message attribute to all validators ) and I'm thinking the best way to
approach this is to create a ValidatorBase class that all tomahawk and
sandbox components would inherit from. This class would provide a
copy of the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-174?page=comments#action_12368801
]
Martin Marinschek commented on TOMAHAWK-174:
Thanks Catalin! I was looking for something like that exactly ;).
regards,
Martin
Enhancement on
forceId not working on inputCalendar
Key: TOMAHAWK-176
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-176
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Type: Bug
Components: Calendar
Versions: 1.1.2-SNAPSHOT
Environment: Facelets
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-174?page=comments#action_12368815
]
Catalin Kormos commented on TOMAHAWK-174:
-
You're welcome :)
Regards,
Catalin
Enhancement on SubFormRenderer to allow partial form submits using Javascript
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-174?page=all ]
updated TOMAHAWK-174:
--
Enhancement on SubFormRenderer to allow partial form submits using Javascript
-
Key:
Can someone please tell me which versions of the project need to be tested
together ? I am having difficulty getting anything to compile. mvn install
w/in each project base dir should be working, right ?
Dennis Byrne
-Original Message-
From: Grant Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, placed it at the wrong position.
Now it works!
---
Mario
Hi!
Ok, the refactoring of
shared/org.apache.myfaces.shared.renderkit.html.util to
tomahawk/org.apache.myfaces.renderkit.html.util is finished.
Tests and examples are still working, so looks promising :-)
Next is the WelcomeFilter.
Ciao,
Mario
I checked out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/branches/1_1_2
and get the following when running 'mvn install' in the base dir.
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
45 matches
Mail list logo