Re: Need description for Core 1.1.4 is not backwards-compatible with Tomahawk 1.1.3. in 1.1.4 annoucmenent

2006-09-17 Thread Paul Spencer
Mike, I added you text, although with some minor changes. Paul Spencer Mike Kienenberger wrote: Hey Paul. Maybe you can help rewrite it so it's more obvious. Apparently the problem is that some of the javascript generated by 1.1.3 isn't compatible with the JSF RI. So in 1.1.4, those

tomahawk config problem

2006-09-17 Thread Fabio Di Biase
Hi i'm tryng an example found on the site http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/07/13/jsfupload.html?page=1 so i'Im using Jbuilder 2006 IDE and jboss 3.2.7 AS. In my application i've added a folder with this libraries: tomahawk1.1.3.jar (myfaces-extensions.jar is old, and i don't have

Re: [VOTE] Dojo into Tomahawk

2006-09-17 Thread Martin Marinschek
There's several things in here we might want to adress: 1) moving renderer independent stuff out of tomahawk into a separate jar (e.g.: alias-bean). This will need a third repackaging of shared. I'm not so sure about this one. I'd rather have tobago become compatible (not merging - compatible)

Re: Release Announcement for MyFaces Core 1.1.4

2006-09-17 Thread Martin Marinschek
Hi Wendy, Mike, Matthias, When you told me that you reverted the getScrolling stuff, I remembered that I also changed the name of the clear..._formName() method. Now if old tomahawk 1.1.3 components expect to call this clear-method, they'd have a java-script exception. So essentially - if you

Re: Tobago and MyFaces

2006-09-17 Thread Martin Marinschek
For me as the original inventor of the Gentleman agreement - the wording was during the time of incubation, so it doesn't affect or bind their status now anymore. regards, Martin On 9/15/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There was a gentleman agreement that there is no commit from

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-168) Tomahawk not support PortletContext and form with 'multipart/form-data'

2006-09-17 Thread Serg Maslyukov (http://webmill.askmore.info) (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-168?page=comments#action_12435313 ] Serg Maslyukov (http://webmill.askmore.info) commented on TOMAHAWK-168: --- This is very simple sollution and not work in

Re: Release Announcement for MyFaces Core 1.1.4

2006-09-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/17/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When you told me that you reverted the getScrolling stuff, I remembered that I also changed the name of the clear..._formName() method. Now if old tomahawk 1.1.3 components expect to call this clear-method, they'd have a java-script

Re: MyFaces Core 1.1.4 - STATUS

2006-09-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
I copied the source and binary distributions to the right place for mirroring, and I'm waiting for Sean to fix permissions under m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository so I can get the jars into the Maven repository. In another thread [1], we're still working out the details of the release announcement.

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-675) Build the example apps with specified versions of MyFaces and Tomahawk

2006-09-17 Thread Wendy Smoak (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-675?page=all ] Wendy Smoak resolved TOMAHAWK-675. -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed This didn't turn out to be as useful as I had hoped. You

Re: Tobago and MyFaces

2006-09-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
yeah. fine. But Bernd and Volker were voted as MYFACES committers *after* incubation was done ... -Matthias On 9/17/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For me as the original inventor of the Gentleman agreement - the wording was during the time of incubation, so it doesn't affect

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-168) Tomahawk not support PortletContext and form with 'multipart/form-data'

2006-09-17 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-168?page=comments#action_12435357 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-168: Serg, It's great that you have additional input to add on this topic, but we need to keep the

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-672) RedirectTrackerManager behavior must be disabled by default

2006-09-17 Thread Kevin Galligan (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-672?page=comments#action_12435360 ] Kevin Galligan commented on TOMAHAWK-672: - See bug #503. I added a patch to explicitly enable the redirecttracker on specific requests.

Help with JIRA bulk change for Core 1.1.4

2006-09-17 Thread Wendy Smoak
Can someone please take care of the setup and bulk change of Core 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT - 1.1.4 ? The steps listed are: * Add a new version to the core project 1.1.4 * Do a bulk change for all resolved issues with version fixed as 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT and change to 1.1.4 * Do a bulk change for all