Hi all,
Why not is this patch applied?
The issue is still open...
Could it be applied for the current version?
Tranks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471286
]
Helmut Swaczinna commented on TOBAGO-215:
-
Sorry for wasting your time. Was my fault. There still was an old
DojoInitializer doesn't render correctly after restoreState
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-886
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-886
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Schuster updated TOMAHAWK-886:
-
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
DojoInitializer doesn't render correctly after
Duplicate Client-Id
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-887
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-887
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Data Scroller
Affects Versions: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Peter Mahoney updated TOMAHAWK-888:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
NPE when using AjaxAnywhere
NPE when using AjaxAnywhere
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-888
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-888
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Reporter: Peter
Hi,
Now that a new myfaces core release seems near, I hope the same will happen for
tomahawk.
Since the branch for tomahawk 1.1.4 is rather outdated by now, I wondered
whether there are any sandbox components eligible for promotion, including the
dojo components. It has been some time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471351
]
Cagatay Civici commented on TOMAHAWK-888:
-
Does the patch makes ajaxanywhere work with myfaces?
NPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerald Müllan updated TOMAHAWK-886:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Thx to Stefan for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471357
]
Peter Mahoney commented on TOMAHAWK-888:
Yes. I now have it working with tree2.
NPE when using
Nice job Cagatay!
Dennis Byrne
On 2/7/07, Cagatay Civici (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-597.
Thanks Dennis:)
On 2/8/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice job Cagatay!
Dennis Byrne
On 2/7/07, Cagatay Civici (JIRA) dev@myfaces.apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
Mike,
I found the thread title s:secure around 16-aug-2006 [1]. I also found
the wiki documentation [2].
1) The wiki page should be move into Tomahawk's documentation. I will
create a JIRA if you like.
2) Deprecation of the attributes enabledOnUserRole and visibleOnUserRole
need to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Spencer resolved TOMAHAWK-885.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
The attributes
Paul,
Performing those tasks would be helpful. Thanks!
On 2/8/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike,
I found the thread title s:secure around 16-aug-2006 [1]. I also found
the wiki documentation [2].
1) The wiki page should be move into Tomahawk's documentation. I will
create a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471520
]
Cagatay Civici commented on TOMAHAWK-885:
-
Just a note; security context is not a bean but a
Cagatay,
When will variable-property resolver be promoted out of the sandbox?
Paul Spencer
Cagatay Civici (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471520
]
Cagatay Civici commented on
Cagatay,
When will variable-property resolver be promoted out of the sandbox?
Paul Spencer
Cagatay Civici (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12471520
]
Cagatay Civici commented on
Move the security context variable-property resolver out of the sandbox
Key: TOMAHAWK-889
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-889
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Document the security context variable-property resolver
Key: TOMAHAWK-891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-891
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Sub-task
Deprecate the attributes enabledOnUserRole and visibleOnUserRole
Key: TOMAHAWK-890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-890
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Compilation failure
Possibly overlooked because it's marked as In Progress rather than
Patch Available.
Unfortunately, I don't see the ability to change the workflow setting
currently available to me.
A quick glance at the patch doesn't show any obvious reasons why it
wouldn't be applied.
One thing that would
The dialog works pretty well as well.
Yes, i also want to promote this component toward tomahawk, it is
quite stable and
it seems that there are many usecases out there.
SelectManyPicklist also seems to be a good candidate for migration and
has lived in sandbox for quite a long time.
After
Gerald Müllan schrieb:
The dialog works pretty well as well.
Yes, i also want to promote this component toward tomahawk, it is
quite stable and
it seems that there are many usecases out there.
SelectManyPicklist also seems to be a good candidate for migration and
has lived in sandbox for
Add mock tests for SecurityContext
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-892
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-892
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Cagatay Civici
Hi Paul,
I think we should document it first at sandbox website, add some mock tests
and start a vote.
I see you've created some issues about this, I also added a subtask related
to testing. I'll complete the testing at the weekend.
Let's talk about this again when we're done with the
28 matches
Mail list logo
