I also think, like Werner that the validators/converters are good
candidates for a promotion.
The myfaces-commons... well... matter of time, isn't it ?
-M
On 3/6/07, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Yes, the myfaces-commons subproject is still missing.
IMHO Converters, Validators,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-302.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Can't find Overlay after ajax request in IE
Hi all,
During 1.2 development I came across the maven-faces-plugin from
trinidad. AFAIK it uses some xml files which contains the model for
the generated components. This saves a lot of time to quickly get new
components into work. But there is room to improve it.
Currently customizing the
can you post that on the mailing of Trinidad ?
I think not that much people here are really familar w/ that
generating framework.
the /**/// or what ever, I added this morning to get rid of an issue
w/ UIViewRoot was something I also hated. AFAIK this was added in the
MyFaces specific part.
Popup closes unexpectedly if command is execuded from inside sheet
--
Key: TOBAGO-310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-310
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478772
]
Volker Weber commented on TOBAGO-310:
-
I have two possible solutions in mind:
First one: replace all occurences
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478773
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-310:
--
I would prefer the second Option.
I don't like the hack in UIPage.
Integrate handling of ajax requests into standard lifecycle
---
Key: TOBAGO-312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-312
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
Onsubmit javascript hookin ability
--
Key: TOBAGO-311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-311
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Volker Weber
Assigned
Depends whether we want the Tomahawk code to be pre-Fusion or not. Of
course Fusion is a separate subproject, so it really only affects the
(deleted) Sandbox components, right?
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 3/5/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not necessarily. There was no 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
If we delete the branch and re-copy it at some later point, then the
release notes and the sandbox page should direct user of the sandbox to
Fusion. As a non-sandbox user, this is an acceptable option.
A scan of the commit message reveal the following commits since the branch:
TOMAHAWK-258
Hi!
Depends whether we want the Tomahawk code to be pre-Fusion or not. Of
course Fusion is a separate subproject, so it really only affects the
(deleted) Sandbox components, right?
Yes, Fusion affects the sandbox only (if at all).
I think Fusion should not be the reason to hold back a Tomahawk
Could someone who knows where parts of the project actually are
please update http://myfaces.apache.org/source-repository.html ? I
don't think any of the links on that page except to svn documentation
have any relationship with what a developer would expect from their
descriptions.
i'm
On 3/7/07, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone who knows where parts of the project actually are
please update http://myfaces.apache.org/source-repository.html ? I
don't think any of the links on that page except to svn documentation
have any relationship with what a developer
Hi All,
In which build of Tomahawk can i find these attributes.
The TLD doc shows reference to it in tomahawk1.1.1 and tomahawk1.1.3.
Any reference on how to use these attributes.
http://myfaces.apache.org/tomahawk/tlddoc/index.html
This was also a JIRA issue :
15 matches
Mail list logo
