+1 for 1.2 as well, MyFaces 2.0 for JSF 1.2 and MyFaces 3.0 for JSF
2.0sounds just strange to me.
Regards,
~ Simon
On 5/18/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-community
members that way and keeps it aligned
Not complete Polish language support
Key: TOMAHAWK-995
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-995
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Calendar
Affects
/schedule.HtmlSchedule/javascript/domLib.js causes flicker for :hover css in IE
7
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-996
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-996
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Joost Schouten updated TOMAHAWK-996:
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
/schedule.HtmlSchedule/javascript/domLib.js causes
+1 for 1.2, based on the advantages of aligning with spec releases.
Best wishes,
Paul
On May 18, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Zubin Wadia wrote:
+1 for 1.2.
IMO, Save 2.0 for JSF2.0. It's just easier to explain to non-
community members that way and keeps it aligned with the spec
releases.
Hello,
Since the Continuum Server doesn't respond anymore, we are going to
restart it.
Best Regards,
Bernd and Arvid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-964.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Seconds are random when input
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cagatay Civici resolved TOMAHAWK-979.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.5)
Component: tc:sheet - Possibility to sort more than 1 column.
-
Key: TOBAGO-402
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-402
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type:
Hello,
We are preparing the next release of Tobago. The vote will be started in
the next days. Please check the issues in JIRA and close the remaining
bugs or move them to a different release.
If you have a productive Tobago application, please check if it works
with the current snapshot.
Markup attribute for tc:selectItem would be nice
Key: TOBAGO-403
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-403
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
Tree2 inputtext values are null
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-997
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Tree2
Affects Versions: 1.1.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496926
]
Grant Smith commented on TOMAHAWK-996:
--
Joost,
Thanks for your work on this, but could you please submit in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Smith updated TOMAHAWK-962:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
JSF 1.1 - MyFaces 1.x
JSF 1.2 - MyFaces 2.x
and I am
+1 for JSF 2.0 (or JSF6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496937
]
Grant Smith commented on TOMAHAWK-882:
--
Tobias,
This issue is marked as Patch Available, yet there is no
let's hope they don't call the next JSF JSF 6 (based on Java EE 6)
But, that would mean, we can jump from 1.2 = 6.
Not to bad! :-))
-M
On 5/17/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2 as well, MyFaces 2.0 for JSF 1.2 and MyFaces 3.0 for JSF 2.0
sounds just strange to me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Smith updated TOMAHAWK-907:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.6-SNAPSHOT
Status: Resolved (was: Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496948
]
Grant Smith commented on TOMAHAWK-955:
--
Zdenek,
Thank you for working with these components. I seem to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Smith updated MYFACES-1491:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Implement the Checkstyle
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
On 5/18/07, Mathias Brökelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for 1.2
2007/5/18, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So,
any interest in making this to 2.0.0 ?
-Matthias
On 2/23/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I am
+1 for Paul's suggestion:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tobias Haubner updated TOMAHAWK-882:
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
missing setNodeId(null) in processDecodes()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Smith resolved TOMAHAWK-630.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Add escape attribute to select* Components
Yeah, looks like a good fix. I doubt the optimization of caching
here is buying us much of anything.
-- Adam
On 5/17/07, Martin Koci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I probably found a problem with BindingFacesMessage class. If calling
getMessage() it resolves value binding only once and then
Hi,
as part of http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-654 , I'm about to
remove the attributes in MyFaces that are not present in the RI. My concern
is breaking user's applications that may already depend on these
attributes... for example commandLink's onclick.
In choosing the lesser of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496988
]
Grant Smith commented on MYFACES-654:
-
Hmm.. now that it's time to remove the attributes in Myfaces that are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496974
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-350:
--
Hello Volker,
any update on this issue?
Regards
Bernd
Overlay
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496966
]
Tobias Haubner commented on TOMAHAWK-882:
-
Grant,
I removed the Patch Available status.
missing
Grant,
I have though about a utility that can be used to ease the pain of
deprecating an TLD tag or attribute. This would help the user/developer
identify where the deprecated tag/attribute is used before it actually
breaks. The utility would:
o Log the deprecation at the warning level.
o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12496996
]
Bruno Aranda commented on MYFACES-1633:
---
A snippet as simple as this can reproduce the issue:
f:view
+1 for 1.2
-1 for 2.0
Using a “2.0” version is going to confuse people.
~~~
Kito D. Mann - Author, JavaServer Faces in Action
http://www.JSFCentral.com http://www.JSFCentral.com - JavaServer Faces FAQ,
news, and info
* Sign
Andrew,
I'm following up to this on the Dev list, as it really belongs there. I
agree with you
regarding the ExtentionFilter issue, and I have seen criticism to the
Tomahawk
approach in the past. There is an ongoing discussion on the Dev list
considering the
direction Tomahawk (or Tomahawk2), so
Please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Gabrielle Crawford!
Gabrielle is working on the Apache MyFaces Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite her to the MyFaces
Project Management Committee (PMC) and fortunately she did accept.
Gabrielle,
Please subscribe to the
Hi folks,
Like Paul Spencer I'm also still
+1
for
MyFaces 1.x.y -- JSF 1.1
MyFaces 2.x.y -- JSF 1.2
MyFaces 3.x.y -- JSF 2.0
MyFaces 4.x.y -- JSF whatever comes next
Here is my explanation for the why:
This one is similar to Tomcat version numbering and I do not remember
anyone complaining
Gabrielle, a warm welcome aboard the MyFaces PMC ship!
--Manfred
On 5/18/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Gabrielle Crawford!
Gabrielle is working on the Apache MyFaces Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite
Yes, logging at warn level (with some explanation) sounds appropriate
for me for all stuff that does not violate the spec but might bring
difficulties with other implementations (or better: the other
implementation ;-)
--Manfred
On 5/18/07, Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grant,
I have
thank you!
On 5/18/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Like Paul Spencer I'm also still
+1
for
MyFaces 1.x.y -- JSF 1.1
MyFaces 2.x.y -- JSF 1.2
MyFaces 3.x.y -- JSF 2.0
MyFaces 4.x.y -- JSF whatever comes next
Here is my explanation for the why:
This one is similar to
Yes, welcome Gabrielle. Please excuse the disturbance on the other end of
the ship, where Manfred will soon be walking the plank over a version number
dispute...
On 5/18/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gabrielle, a warm welcome aboard the MyFaces PMC ship!
--Manfred
On 5/18/07,
Although the world's end is close: I'm a good swimmer and I'm not
afraid of sharks Mr Grant Pirate Smith!
:)
On 5/18/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, welcome Gabrielle. Please excuse the disturbance on the other end of
the ship, where Manfred will soon be walking the plank over a
Congratulations Gabrielle!
On 5/18/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although the world's end is close: I'm a good swimmer and I'm not
afraid of sharks Mr Grant Pirate Smith!
:)
On 5/18/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, welcome Gabrielle. Please excuse the disturbance
Ugh!!
I still think the benefits you mentioned do not outweigh the benefit of not
confusing our users :) You do make a valid point regarding compatibility,
but I don't see why we can't stick with MyFaces 1.2.x and have all the
component libs follow the same version numbers ? I guess I don't
You've not seen the new sharks with lasers on their heads, apparently !
On 5/18/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although the world's end is close: I'm a good swimmer and I'm not
afraid of sharks Mr Grant Pirate Smith!
:)
On 5/18/07, Grant Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes,
And in MyFaces 1.2 these issues do not exist anymore,
Cheers,
Bruno
On 18/05/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, logging at warn level (with some explanation) sounds appropriate
for me for all stuff that does not violate the spec but might bring
difficulties with other
I guess my $0.02 from the peanut gallery is that if myfaces 1.2 is
an incremental improvement over 1.1 that doesn't have giant
technology changes in its core but does happen to implement jsf 1.2
then 1.2 is a more appropriate name. If there are big core
architectural changes so it
Facelets: labelAndAccessKey and textAndAccessKey don't work
---
Key: TRINIDAD-25
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-25
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Facelets: nextAction/previousAction on singleStepButtonBar aren't supported
---
Key: TRINIDAD-26
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-26
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Welcome to the gang, Gab!
-- Adam
On 5/18/07, Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Gabrielle!
On 5/18/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Although the world's end is close: I'm a good swimmer and I'm not
afraid of sharks Mr Grant Pirate Smith!
:)
On 5/18/07,
On 5/18/2007 2:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Gabrielle Crawford!
Gabrielle is working on the Apache MyFaces Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a vote to invite her to the MyFaces
Project Management Committee (PMC) and fortunately she
Congratulations, welcome in.
On 5/18/07, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/2007 2:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Please welcome our new MyFaces PMC member Gabrielle Crawford!
Gabrielle is working on the Apache MyFaces Trinidad stuff.
Therefore last week there was a
On 5/18/07, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
duh, I should probably know this, but which site?
Ah, it's a trick. :) Assuming you have the current' svn external
checked out [1] then edit
maven/master-pom/pom.xml
and add yourself or edit your information. That information gets
yeah,
also we used to have this guy:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/myfaces/site/trunk/src/site/xdoc/project_management/contributors.xml?
... ;-(
On 5/18/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/18/07, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
duh, I should probably know this, but
51 matches
Mail list logo