I usually run build from cmd and mvn eclipse:eclipse generates my projects,
that's enough, at least for me.
On 6/15/07, Chris Hane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to build trinidad using the eclipse mvn plugin?
I can checkout trinidad and build it from the command line. When I try
nice move.
thx!
On 6/15/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've merged the XMLHttp-switchover (TRINIDAD-46) onto
Trinidad trunk (1.0.2-SNAPSHOT builds).
Some of the big changes:
- All the old PPR code is dead.
- We still do use an IFRAME when we need to process
a file upload, but
works on my local box.
On 6/15/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this maven weirdness ?
Depends. It's complaining that it can't find some snapshots, and the
fact that it's only listing the central repo makes me think that a
In this case, the snapshots are artifacts that are also built by
the continuum box, so I'd assume that the continuum mvn
build would find them in its own local repository.
-- Adam
On 6/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
works on my local box.
On 6/15/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL
Hi!
What needs to be done to have a nightly build of orchestra and continuum
running?
Someone to volunteer?
Thanks!
Ciao,
Mario
yes, I had a similar thing yesterday evening,
build a thing with maven, inside the same build, but two steps later,
it was trying to download the before build artifacts.
-M
On 6/15/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In this case, the snapshots are artifacts that are also built by
the
just add the mvn default command.
do u have an account ?
On 6/15/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
What needs to be done to have a nightly build of orchestra and continuum
running?
Someone to volunteer?
Thanks!
Ciao,
Mario
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog:
I'm already doing.
let's see how far I get...
--Manfred
On 6/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just add the mvn default command.
do u have an account ?
On 6/15/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
What needs to be done to have a nightly build of orchestra
Do you have any dependencies from within plugins (assembly, javadoc,
tlddoc, etc.)?
I mean dependencies that are not defined via normal dependency tags
under project dependencies block but rather from within a plugin's
dependencies element?
Maven seems to dissolve these dependencies not within
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505065
]
Guido Dubois commented on TOBAGO-425:
-
Hi Volker,
no, it doesn't work with an action and null as outcome.
continuum rocks! here you go:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/orchestra/
--Manfred
On 6/15/07, Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm already doing.
let's see how far I get...
--Manfred
On 6/15/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12504163
]
Manfred Geiler edited comment on TOMAHAWK-983 at 6/15/07 12:02 AM:
---
Thanks rajat
Hi Mr. Continuum!
continuum rocks! here you go:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/myfaces/orchestra/
Wow - THAT was bleedingly fast
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Mario
what we just got reminded today: never overpraise a piece of software!
Continuum is out of mem... :-(
Someone who is not behind a ssh restricting firewall (like me) can
please restart it?
Thanks,
Manfred
On 6/15/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mr. Continuum!
continuum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505109
]
Tomáš Bubeník commented on TOMAHAWK-810:
There might be xmlhttp.send(); instead of xmlhttp.send(null); on
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 15, 2007 11:36 AM
Subject: Call for Papers Opens for OS Summit Asia 2007
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call for Papers Opens for OS Summit Asia 2007
The call for papers is now open for OS
selectManyCheckbox ignores Attribute inline=true
--
Key: TOBAGO-429
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-429
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505151
]
Tomáš Bubeník commented on TOMAHAWK-810:
http://forum.nextapp.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t3745.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505217
]
Tomáš Bubeník commented on TOMAHAWK-810:
The above described problem probably occurs only in applications
Looks good. We've been looking to get exactly this sort of thing
in our app, and I was about to start looking into creating a component
just like this. I guess you've beat me to it! Once you have something
available, I'd like to play around with it... but just from the attached
image and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505214
]
rajat commented on TOMAHAWK-983:
Thanks Manfred for fixing this. In hindsight, it would have more sense to put
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505231
]
Tomáš Bubeník commented on TOMAHAWK-810:
Error NS_ERROR_NOT_AVAILABLE occurs with reading status code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomáš Bubeník updated TOMAHAWK-810:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
commandNavigation2 in PanelNavigation2 is not
Here's an example of the c:choose syntax for comparison, from
http://www.awprofessional.com/articles/article.asp?p=102219seqNum=9rl=1
c:choose
c:when test=${param.whichPage == 'red'}
jsp:forward page=red.jsp/
/c:when
c:when test=${param.whichPage == 'green'}
jsp:forward page=blue.jsp/
panelPartialRoot.jspx and related configuration should be removed from
trinidad-demo
Key: TRINIDAD-64
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-64
From: Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew,
I'm not an expert on c:choose, but from the one time I tried to use
it, the syntax and functionality seemed quite different.
If there's going to be a sandbox:choose component, I would hope that
it would be the render-time equivalent
Thatnks for the feedback, I think I will rename it to avoid confusion
since it isn't the same as c:choose. Perhaps something like
selectiveRenderer or limitRendered?
On 6/15/07, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew,
I'm not an expert on
Andrew,
I'm not an expert on c:choose, but from the one time I tried to use
it, the syntax and functionality seemed quite different.
If there's going to be a sandbox:choose component, I would hope that
it would be the render-time equivalent of the c:choose build-time tag.
Since I don't think
Adam,
I think Trinidad is working (although I havn't checked the inline frame
lately). Still, it would probably be prudent on general principals. Do
you want me to log the tickets?
Scott
Adam Winer wrote:
And separate ones for Trinidad and Tomahawk too, I think!
-- Adam
On 6/14/07,
One more thing... We shouldn't fix these until the 301 bridge is
available which does this special handling for encodeActionUrl. I don't
think the current bridge properly encodes external urls so I don't want
to break anyone for the time being. So at the very least the
environment should be
Wow, that really makes a total hash of things. So
you're saying there's one set of rules - which don't
really work at all - today, and another set of rules
tomorrow? Could you explain what the rules are
today?
At any rate, if there are differences between the state
of affairs today (totally
:) I'm not being clear.
Ok, the current bridge implementations don't take into account the
complexity of this issue. And as you said, Adam, the Faces spec isn't
much help either. But someone who is using the current Faces
implementation with the current bridge is expecting their
LOL. I need to read everything before I respond. Yes, I agree with the
second part of your letter. Say we're 301 and fix the current bridge to
handle the encoding correctly. I should have that code fairly soon and
it wouldn't be an issue to move it into the current bridge implementation.
33 matches
Mail list logo
