Hi,
in Trinidad we only publish the javadoc for API-based classes and not
for impl-specific ones.
MyFaces core is currently delivering in the assembled stuff both, API and IMPL.
What do we want to do ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
I don't feel Trinidad should have to document IMPL related code just because
the core does. I also don't think we should stop documenting core because
Trinidad only documents the API based code.
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
in Trinidad we only
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
--
Dennis Byrne
no,
not because of trinidad.
My point was that it might be *cleaner* to not publish impl doc,
I don't have a strong feeling on this one, to be honest. I just
remembered, when I was looking at the MyFaces 1.2.0 out-of-date
assembly :-)
-Matthias
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 as well
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [2]).
Please take a look at the 1.2.0 artifacts and vote!
Please note: This vote is majority approval with a minimum of three
+1 votes (see
+1
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [2]).
Please take a look at the 1.2.0 artifacts and vote!
Please note: This
+1
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [2]).
Please take a look at the 1.2.0 artifacts and vote!
Please note: This
+1
regards,
Martin
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 as well
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it is 2007 :)
Dennis Byrne
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
+1
regards,
Martin
On 7/14/07, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and
Refactoring of ResourceManagerImpl caches
-
Key: TOBAGO-451
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-451
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 1.0.11
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-437.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Exception when sorting on column with tc:link
Definitely, no one here has to do anything. :) The question
is whether delivering Javadoc for the IMPL is one the
whole a good or bad thing... Someone who is an active
developer on MyFaces can, of course, easily run javadoc
on their own.
IMO, the target of Javadoc in distributions is the
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache account ([1] and [2]).
Please take a look at the 1.2.0 artifacts and vote!
+1
Thanks!
Bruno
On 14/07/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache
+1,
regards,
Cagatay
On 7/14/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Thanks!
Bruno
On 14/07/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0
+1
On 7/14/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1,
regards,
Cagatay
On 7/14/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Thanks!
Bruno
On 14/07/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Matthias Wessendorf
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
+1
On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog:
+1
On 7/14/07, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/15/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 7/14/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Best wishes,
Paul
On Jul 14, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Should we do it now ?
The _dist dirctory isn't there:
[2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/myfaces120/_dist/
Niall
On 7/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.0 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
.
The artifacts are deployed to my private Apache
23 matches
Mail list logo
