Re: svn commit: r602459 - /myfaces/orchestra/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/myfaces/orchestra/conversation/spring/AbstractSpringOrchestraScope.java

2007-12-08 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Sorry for the whitespace stuff, I thought I reverted them. This one is the real patch: Author: imario Date: Sat Dec 8 05:05:14 2007 New Revision: 602459 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=602459view=rev Log: fixed regression regarding viewController scope Modified:

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Andrew Robinson
I prefer the M On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces capital M version. I know that many of us are familiar with MyFaces version and I either. I propose the myFaces, small m from the

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Bruno Aranda
I prefer the lower case m, Cheers, Bruno On 08/12/2007, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer the M On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree with the MyFaces capital M version. I

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong.. On Dec 8, 2007 8:05 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I prefer the M On Dec 8, 2007 8:33 AM, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I look on all comments and I seen the majority agree

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 12/8/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I too, and I think it is confusing, when we start to write it wrong.. snip/ Indeed, its important to get the name right (case et al), especially in the logo :-) -Rahul

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Bruno Aranda
I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For instance, most of the time we write in this list Oracle instead of ORACLE (logo). I guess we should just choose which one is more appealing to us, so just vote and

Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces

2007-12-08 Thread Gary VanMatre
From: Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] Perhaps, we just should wait, when it comes to Faces 2.x impl and take the bits, as we need them; same is true for Orchestra (like Dialog/VC) as well. Besides that, the Test may be interesting for us, since we use it, and I'd like to see

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Cagatay Civici
M :) On Dec 8, 2007 9:47 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not so sure if it is the same writing the official name of the project (Apache MyFaces) that what we find in the (myFaceS). For instance, most of the time we write in this list Oracle instead of ORACLE (logo). I guess we

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Eh, I think that is total different beast. We all work here as individuals and it is ok to misspell names... But... starting to misspell the own project, is ... yes, confusing. -M On Dec 8, 2007 8:47 PM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not so sure if it is the same writing the

Re: myFaces vs MyFaces ... what do you think ?

2007-12-08 Thread Adonis Raduca
I think that is important to have a consistent naming strategy for all myFaces (MyFaces) projects. For example I thought to one similar with the Java naming convention for the instance variables. Something like: myFaces tobago tomahawk … I think that once the naming strategy will be in place