the main problem is,
that there is no javadoc in tomahawk's start page.
PS: Aargh.. I hate top-posting.
I don't get that.
-M
Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
I was talking about the Tomahawk TLD doc.
It used to be listed under documentation / javadocs (on
Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
the main problem is,
that there is no javadoc in tomahawk's start page.
There never was AFAIK.
Do you mean that now there is no link in the main myfaces page, we should add a
link on the Tomahawk page so people do not need to open the
h:commandLink doesn't execute action when Javascript is disabled
Key: MYFACES-1808
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1808
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type:
:-)
On Jan 23, 2008 1:12 AM, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
the main problem is,
that there is no javadoc in tomahawk's start page.
There never was AFAIK.
Do you mean that now there is no link in the main myfaces page, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561706#action_12561706
]
Bart Kummel commented on TRINIDAD-827:
--
I can confirm this behaviour. I use 1.2.4 on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Freedman updated PORTLETBRIDGE-15:
--
Status: Open (was: Patch Available)
Create Bridge Demo Projects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561722#action_12561722
]
Michael Freedman commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-15:
---
Okay, I canceled the
+1
Leonardo Uribe wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.2 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v3.0.2 [1]
2. Maven artifact group
Add hooks to CoreRenderer for before and after encode
-
Key: TRINIDAD-916
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-916
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: New Feature
Datascroller not rendering links correctly when javascript-detection on
---
Key: TOMAHAWK-1180
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1180
Project: MyFaces Tomahawk
tr:form defaultCommand does no partial triggering
-
Key: TRINIDAD-917
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-917
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Cooper resolved TRINIDAD-901.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.6-core
Assignee: Matt Cooper
Resolved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Robinson resolved TRINIDAD-916.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.6-core
1.0.6-core
Change applied
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-916
On Jan 22, 2008 4:05 PM, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
well, then - if there is a valid reason in this case -
I have seen other cases where such restrictions don't make sense.
regards,
Martin
On Jan 22,
I am trying to skin the trinidad tree so it looks like the ADF Faces
tree. Looks good so far, but I am struggeling with the folder icon. I
downloaded Trinidad 1.2.5 (the latest release). Looking at the
treeRenderer and the SkinSelector class, it appears (as I understand the
code) that the
There are static methods on CoreRenderer that I have no idea why they are
static. The two in particular that I noticed:
static public void renderStyleClass
static public void renderStyleClasses
These are methods for renderers, why would they be static?
There are some util style classes that are
Hello Frank,
I see the following selectors in SkinSelectors:
public static final String AF_TREE_EXPANDED_ICON =
af|tree::expanded-icon;
public static final String AF_TREE_COLLAPSED_ICON =
af|tree::collapsed-icon;
So the good skin's CSS value should be:
Create a tx:selectManyCheckbox Extension Tag
Key: TOBAGO-604
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-604
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core,
Simon,
thanks, I will give the different URL usage a try. Note that I am not
talking about the expanded / disclosed icon, but the folder icon. In
ADF Faces the node icon (disclosed / expanded) is a puls/minus image.
That I got working in Trinidad. However, after that icon in ADF Faces
there
Hi
I have refactored the tree skinning in november.
But it was only comitted in the 1.0.* trunk.
I will try to prepare a patch for 1.2.* this week-end.
(hope I'll have some time)
On Jan 23, 2008 8:58 PM, Frank Nimphius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
thanks, I will give the different URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Cooper resolved TRINIDAD-903.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.6-core
1.0.6-core
Fixed in:
I have refactored the tree skinning in november.
But it was only comitted in the 1.0.* trunk.
I will try to prepare a patch for 1.2.* this week-end.
(hope I'll have some time)
do you know for sure that you committed them after the 1.2.x trunk
was created ?
-M
On Jan 23, 2008 8:58 PM,
Cristi,
can you open a jira issue for that?
thanks!
On Jan 23, 2008 12:11 PM, Cristi Toth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I have refactored the tree skinning in november.
But it was only comitted in the 1.0.* trunk.
I will try to prepare a patch for 1.2.* this week-end.
(hope I'll have some
the 1.0.x trunk merge to 1.2_x was done on
4th Dec 2007.
if you stuff was committed before that date, it should be in the 1.2.x as well.
Thx,
M
On Jan 23, 2008 1:10 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have refactored the tree skinning in november.
But it was only comitted in
maven-jdev-plugin does not evaluate !DOCTYPE tag correctly for taglib (.tld)
files
Key: TRINIDAD-919
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-919
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-516?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Bohmann resolved TOBAGO-516.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Unable to deploy Tobago sample application to JSF RI 1.2_05 RC3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved TRINIDAD-919.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.7-plugins
maven-jdev-plugin does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561838#action_12561838
]
Michael Freedman commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-15:
---
Eduardo,
I think I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561838#action_12561838
]
mike_freedman edited comment on PORTLETBRIDGE-15 at 1/23/08 2:30 PM:
Andrew Robinson wrote:
There are static methods on CoreRenderer that I have no idea why they
are static. The two in particular that I noticed:
static public void renderStyleClass
static public void renderStyleClasses
These are methods for renderers, why would they be static?
There are some
Hi!
One thing in JSF which constantly worries me is, that it is not easily
possible to create a more complicated table layout with
group/group/detail style.
What I mean is somthing like this:
Name Column1 Column2
Data1HeaderInformation1
Sub1HeaderInformation1
Name1 10 20
31 matches
Mail list logo
