Broken links in left navigation bar (on Tag Documentation pages)
-
Key: TRINIDAD-1000
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1000
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Enhance Detail-Presentation of FacesMessage-details
---
Key: TOBAGO-635
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-635
Project: MyFaces Tobago
Issue Type: Improvement
Yes, long descriptions are supported; see the example output I showed in
the original email. And I see no reason why every option currently
offered in xml cannot be supported via either an annotation or even
better automatically by introspecting the classes.
I did want to build the
Hi!
The tar.gz and zip archives are deployed at [3]
LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt are missing from, at least, the tar.gz archive.
+1 when fixed.
Not so important, but, it looks like these archives are a mixture of
-bin and -src (which is fine I think), but no class files beside the jar
are in
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, long descriptions are supported; see the example output I showed in
the original email. And I see no reason why every option currently
offered in xml cannot be supported via either an annotation or even
+1
-M
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:38 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
As has been discussed recently, it is time to get a core-1.1 release out.
This requires releasing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Marinschek resolved ORCHESTRA-15.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1
Assignee: Mario Ivankovits
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
-M
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:38 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
FacesMessageWrapper does not include label and wrapper properties when
serializing
--
Key: TRINIDAD-1001
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1001
+1
On 10/03/2008, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
-M
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
Hi Scott,
great thing! However, I am getting this on startup:
javax.portlet.PortletException: doBridgeDispatch failed: error from
Bridge in executing the request
at
javax.portlet.faces.GenericFacesPortlet.doBridgeDispatch(GenericFacesPortlet.java:404)
at
Hi All (and particularly Bruno):
In core 1.2, class UIComponentClassicTagBase messes with the id field
of components if they are in an iterator, adding a (clumsy) unique
suffix string.
And for some reason it defines in an interator as any kind of include
or forward.
So doing something like
Honestly... I don't remember, but I think I got this idea from somewhere
else (otherwise I would remember). Writing the UIComponentClassicTagBase
class was the most complicate part for me and one of the first things I did
for the 1.2 implementation. Probably the generate IDs ensure that the ids do
Ok, thanks Bruno.
I'll create a jira issue for this, then try to find some time soon to
look into the related specs. At the least we need to document this, but
hopefully can tidy up the id suffixes too. It's a little embarrasing
that tomahawk forceId works on Sun but not on myfaces :-)
See you
+1
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
+1
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1,
regards,
Martin
On 3/7/08, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to release the
suffix added to component id when including files
-
Key: MYFACES-1834
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1834
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577054#action_12577054
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on MYFACES-1834:
Wouldn't it make more sense to
This is for both Mojarra and MyFaces...
regards,
Martin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
great thing! However, I am getting this on startup:
javax.portlet.PortletException: doBridgeDispatch failed: error from
Bridge in executing the
Hmm. I wasn't getting that and I think Mike was able to test it out as
well.. Let me ask you a few things:
1. are you using the RI? Myfaces doesn't currently work for some reason.
2. I had a similar issue when I was trying to use an old browser
window. Pluto/jetty was trying to resolve
Duh, I should read. Try restarting the browser. :) I'll try it again
later today. Mike, did you get this working?
Martin Marinschek wrote:
This is for both Mojarra and MyFaces...
regards,
Martin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Scott,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577083#action_12577083
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on TRINIDAD-961:
I'm not sure I agree with this patch.
Hi guys,
on refresh, everything works just perfectly - it is only the first
request that was falling down on me, and yes, I am using the RI.
I just put myself in the debugger - this is what I saw after the first
line of this segment:
PortletSession portletSession =
Hi guys,
interestingly enough, it works as well with MyFaces for me - just as
expected (with the same start-up hickup). Great news!
regards,
Martin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Martin Marinschek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
on refresh, everything works just perfectly - it is only
Enchance tr:column's sortProperty to accept numeric index if table's row class
is array or List
---
Key: TRINIDAD-1002
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577117#action_12577117
]
Vadim Dmitriev commented on TRINIDAD-695:
-
Just a wild thought: won't it be a
Scott,
I don't have a problem with moving the default implementation for
getContainerClientId(FacesContext context, UIComponent child) up into
UIXComponent and making it concrete (not abstract).
I am not sure what the original rationale was for keeping implementation out
of UIXComponent. Looking
Ok, svn and dist file are now synced.
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 22:41 +0100, Bernd Bohmann wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/maven/trunk/KEYS
but I see some keys are missing in svn.
Mario Ivankovits
Leonardo Uribe
Scott O'Bryan
are not available in svn.
Thomas
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
Please take a look at the 1.0.7 artifacts and vote
[ ] +1 for community members
With myfaces I was seeing intermittent with the navigation of the test
case... The RI seems to work perfectly. At first glance, Mike thought
it might be an issue with the serialized view that MyFaces is saving on
the request scope being preserved between renders.
It might be as simple as
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
Please take a look at the 1.0.7 artifacts
Sorry about this guys. I did my very first release a couple of weeks
ago and added the keys into the files and everything, but I didn't move
them into svn...
Scott
simon wrote:
Ok, svn and dist file are now synced.
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 22:41 +0100, Bernd Bohmann wrote:
+1
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
Please
intermittent what?
regards,
Martin
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With myfaces I was seeing intermittent with the navigation of the test
case... The RI seems to work perfectly. At first glance, Mike thought
it might be an issue with the serialized
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 09:02 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
The tar.gz and zip archives are deployed at [3]
LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt are missing from, at least, the tar.gz archive.
+1 when fixed.
Ok, the assembly.xml file has been tweaked and assemblies regenerated so
the LICENSE
Sorry, intermittent navigation. What I did in my test is I went to the
main page, navigated to the Hello World application. This took
several tries the first time I tried it, went right in the second. I
then proceeded to enter my name, click submit, then click return, and
repeat. After a
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:33 AM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 09:02 +0100, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
The tar.gz and zip archives are deployed at [3]
LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt are missing from, at least, the tar.gzarchive.
+1 when fixed.
Ok, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577183#action_12577183
]
Veena K. Pandit commented on TRINIDAD-985:
--
Yes, I have tried; that works but
Hi,
I can see that subform needs defaultCommand, what other issue are you
solving? The issue says what you did, but not why.
I just skimmed the proposal, and this is making me nervous.
id format of default command components:
[custom id]defaultCommand
If you're saying we'll identify
Currently UIXComponent is a pure abstract class and does not have *any*
implementation in it (except for a set of static methods which were recently
added).
Should I:
1) Move the implementation for getContainerClientId(FacesContext context,
UIComponent child) up to UIXComponent and break the
However these kind of style rules are unreliable. Our html is an
implementation detail, and can change, meaning it could be a span today,
a div tomorrowhave you tried using skinning to get what you need?
Thanks,
Gabrielle
jtherr wrote:
We recently integrated Trinidad into our
Hi Matthias,
Thanks for reminding me about Tobago. I did mean to have a look at their
configuration-handling, but had not got around to it. I have spent the
last hour or so looking at it, and here's a brief summary.
The tobago-tool-annotation module defines a bunch of source-retention
annotation
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
Please take a look at the 1.2.7 artifacts and vote
[ ] +1 for community members
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
Please take a look at the 1.2.7
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 22:18 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
Wow. You guys really believe in release often don't you :-)
Well we ARE releasing two codelines.. :)
+1
simon wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 22:18 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
Apache account ([1]).
I'd say leave it in UIXComponentBase.
Kamran Kashanian wrote:
Currently UIXComponent is a pure abstract class and does not have
*any* implementation in it (except for a set of static methods which
were recently added).
Should I:
1) Move the implementation for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577208#action_12577208
]
Bernd Bohmann commented on TOBAGO-572:
--
Can you try the suggested fix?
Duplicate
Hey Gab, Jon -
On 3/10/08, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However these kind of style rules are unreliable. Our html is an
implementation detail, and can change, meaning it could be a span today,
a div tomorrow
Good point... My interpretation of Jon's concern is that the
We need *.cur to be loadable by the trinidad resource servlet.
---
Key: TRINIDAD-1003
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1003
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577226#action_12577226
]
Guido Dubois commented on TOBAGO-572:
-
I will try it in a short while...
Duplicate
Hi.
Is there any chance that this patch will be included in the 1.1.6
release or even in the 1.1.5 version in a fix-release?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1827
Well you know my vote, I'm concerned about the incompatibility and,
frankly, having it only in base provides us nothing but a nicer looking
class. Ultimately though, if nobody else cares I'm willing to let it
slide. I just think it sets a bad precedent.
Scott
Max Starets wrote:
I'd say
Hi,
I'll have a look at it.
-Thomas
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Veit Guna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Is there any chance that this patch will be included in the 1.1.6
release or even in the 1.1.5 version in a fix-release?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1827
Scott O'Bryan said the following On 3/10/2008 3:24 PM PT:
Well you know my vote, I'm concerned about the incompatibility
If I really thought there was much of a chance that anyone had already
subclassed UIXComponent itself, I would be more worried.
and, frankly, having it only in base provides
fixed, thanks for your patch!
Thomas
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'll have a look at it.
-Thomas
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Veit Guna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
Is there any chance that this patch will be included in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12577245#action_12577245
]
Jeanne Waldman commented on TRINIDAD-472:
-
Andy sent me the icons, and I applied
That's not what I'm saying..
Interfaces absolutely have their place. But this is not an interface,
it's an abstract class and rightfully so. An interface is good for
providing one-way dependencies. That is, for exposing something which
always has a well known implementation that may be
Scott O'Bryan said the following On 3/10/2008 4:52 PM PT:
That's not what I'm saying..
Interfaces absolutely have their place. But this is not an interface,
it's an abstract class and rightfully so. An interface is good for
providing one-way dependencies. That is, for exposing something
Then I think we are in agreement. I think it'll at least be open till
tomorrow anyway to get input from our friends on the other side of the
globe. :)
Scott
Blake Sullivan wrote:
Scott O'Bryan said the following On 3/10/2008 4:52 PM PT:
That's not what I'm saying..
Interfaces absolutely
hello gabrielle,
thank you for joining the discussion!
as i said:
it isn't a replacement of the current mechanism!
it's just an additional/alternative approach and you are free to activate it
within the web.xml - including all advantages and disadvantages.
(in most cases every solution provides
Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hello gabrielle,
thank you for joining the discussion!
:-)
as i said:
it isn't a replacement of the current mechanism!
it's just an additional/alternative approach and you are free to
activate it within the web.xml - including all advantages and
disadvantages.
(in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jeanne Waldman resolved TRINIDAD-1003.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jeanne Waldman
We need *.cur to be loadable by
Gabrielle Crawford said the following On 3/10/2008 5:50 PM PT:
Gerhard Petracek wrote:
hello gabrielle,
thank you for joining the discussion!
:-)
as i said:
it isn't a replacement of the current mechanism!
it's just an additional/alternative approach and you are free to
activate it within
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The
+1, made a quicktest against our test suite during build with 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
Also, I did remove aop-proxy from my spring configuration for fun.
-D
Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
As has been discussed recently, it is time to get a core-1.1 release out.
This requires releasing the
Simon,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:21 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 22:18 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.2.7 release of the Apache
MyFaces Trinidad CORE out. The artifacts are deployed to my private
66 matches
Mail list logo
