An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
Hi Team, Is there anyone that faces this issue during building Tomahawk ? *java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.codehaus.plexus.util.FileUtils.getDefaultExclud es()[Ljava/lang/String; at org.codehaus.plexus.components.io.fileselectors.IncludeExcludeFileSel

Re: Checkstyle rules

2008-07-01 Thread Manfred Geiler
+1 (yes, change the myfaces-master-pom ...) --Manfred On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:28 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I'd like to clean up the way we do our checkstyle rule checking. Right now we point the maven-checkstyle-report plugin directly at a

Re: Checkstyle rules

2008-07-01 Thread Bruno Aranda
+1 2008/7/1 Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 (yes, change the myfaces-master-pom ...) --Manfred On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:28 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As I mentioned a few weeks ago, I'd like to clean up the way we do our checkstyle rule checking. Right now we point

Re: [myfaces-builder-plugin] generate site files describing component, like maven-tagdoc-plugin

2008-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Leonardo Uribe schrieb: I'm not sure that (1) is possible. The existing extended doc pages contain screenshots, html tables, etc. that just cannot be represented as javadoc AFAIK. So there would be no way to enhance the javadoc on components in a way that would

Re: Checkstyle rules

2008-07-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 sounds good to me On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 2008/7/1 Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 (yes, change the myfaces-master-pom ...) --Manfred On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:28 PM, simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As I mentioned a few

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I noticed this error a while ago, when building Trinidad. This is one of the typical random build issues, which you can't foresee when using maven ,-) I guess you run with a very recent maven, right? I think using 2.0.4 this will not show up, but this switch causes other issues, since some

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
Thanks Matzew, I will try Maven 2.0.4. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed this error a while ago, when building Trinidad. This is one of the typical random build issues, which you can't foresee when using maven ,-) I guess you run with a

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Hazem, I've just rebuilt tomahawk and had no problem. Well, after I edited the pom.xml and sandbox/pom.xml to comment out the core12 stuff which doesn't compile. Note that maven does not support multiple concurrent instances accessing the same local maven repository. So you cannot run

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1723) f:param should display a warning if name=id

2008-07-01 Thread Gertjan van Oosten (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1723?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12609495#action_12609495 ] Gertjan van Oosten commented on MYFACES-1723: - As far as I'm concerned this

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
Thank you Simon and Matzew for your great tips. It works now fine with me. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Hazem, I've just rebuilt tomahawk and had no problem. Well, after I edited the pom.xml and sandbox/pom.xml to comment out the core12

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Simon and Matzew for your great tips. It works now fine with me. what happened ? -M On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Hazem, I've just rebuilt tomahawk and had

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
I downgraded maven to 2.0.4 and removed the core12 from the (pom.xml) file. It now works great! On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you Simon and Matzew for your great tips.

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downgraded maven to 2.0.4 and removed the core12 from the (pom.xml) file. do you mind to try with your old version ? -M It now works great! On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
ok I will try and tell u the result. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I downgraded maven to 2.0.4 and removed the core12 from the (pom.xml) file. do you mind to try with your

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
It runs successfully too after I upgraded my maven version. This means that the root cause of the problem was because of the core12 :). On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok I will try and tell u the result. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Matthias

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-1294) Typo in message when detailMessage and message are both set.

2008-07-01 Thread David Waters (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Waters updated TOMAHAWK-1294: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) Typo in message when detailMessage and message are

Re: An error during build

2008-07-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
ah, thanks it is good that maven is not the source of issue here. Well, this time ;-) On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It runs successfully too after I upgraded my maven version. This means that the root cause of the problem was because of the core12 :).

[jira] Created: (TOBAGO-686) Tobago Example Adressbook doesn't work anymore

2008-07-01 Thread Tobias Glensk (JIRA)
Tobago Example Adressbook doesn't work anymore -- Key: TOBAGO-686 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-686 Project: MyFaces Tobago Issue Type: Bug Components: Demo

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-1293) promoting the selectOneRow component to Tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hazem Saleh resolved TOMAHAWK-1293. --- Resolution: Fixed promoting the selectOneRow component to Tomahawk

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1138) Trinidad Release 1.0.8 Skin Rendering Problem

2008-07-01 Thread dominico francisco (JIRA)
Trinidad Release 1.0.8 Skin Rendering Problem - Key: TRINIDAD-1138 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1138 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions:

Re: t:graphicImage doesnot generate XHTML complaint code

2008-07-01 Thread Mike Kienenberger
I agree with Simon in that where the image usage is not under our control (like t:graphicImage), we should not output an alt tag unless the end-user specifies an alt tag. On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Hazem Saleh

Re: [myfaces-builder-plugin] generate site files describing component, like maven-tagdoc-plugin

2008-07-01 Thread Leonardo Uribe
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leonardo Uribe schrieb: I'm not sure that (1) is possible. The existing extended doc pages contain screenshots, html tables, etc. that just cannot be represented as javadoc AFAIK. So there

Re: [VOTE] promoting the selectOneRow component to Tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
Congratulations! Promotion is done. On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for the promotion, as I remember this component was donated to myfaces in 2005 by my brother, and I

Re: Checkstyle rules

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
++1. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 sounds good to me On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 2008/7/1 Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +1 (yes, change the myfaces-master-pom ...) --Manfred

[VOTE] Upgrade s:limitRendered to tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Checking the code, examples, documentation and previous discussions, the functionality of s:limitRendered component is complete, so we can propose it to be upgraded to tomahawk. So please vote in the following way [+1] for agreeing with promoting the component to the next Tomahawk release.

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade s:limitRendered to tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Hazem Saleh
+1. On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Checking the code, examples, documentation and previous discussions, the functionality of s:limitRendered component is complete, so we can propose it to be upgraded to tomahawk. So please vote in the

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade s:limitRendered to tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Leonardo Uribe
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1. On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Checking the code, examples, documentation and previous discussions, the functionality of s:limitRendered component is complete, so we can

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade s:limitRendered to tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Andrew Robinson
+1 On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Checking the code, examples, documentation and previous discussions, the functionality of s:limitRendered component is complete, so we can propose it to be upgraded to tomahawk. So please vote in the following

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade s:limitRendered to tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Andrew Robinson
Curious since this guy doesn't actually print any HTML and has no renderer if we would rather put it in commons? I'm okay either way, just thought it would be worth considering. On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:32 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade s:limitRendered to tomahawk

2008-07-01 Thread Leonardo Uribe
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1, but I also agree that it should be put into commons rather than Tomahawk if there's no limiting factor. There is one dependency to: org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.renderkit.RendererUtils Gerhard told me once