[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-1466:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.10-plugins
Status:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12705967#action_12705967
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on TRINIDAD-1467:
--
fix is easy. We just need
missing _en stub resources in trinidad-api and trinidad-impl.jar
Key: TRINIDAD-1467
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1467
Project: MyFaces Trinidad
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matthias Weßendorf resolved TRINIDAD-1467.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.12-core
missing _en stub
Looks ok to me, the parsing is not omitted but instead
the option to render the head and body without parsing is added.
Either way, I have the parser in place now and will commit it tomorrow.
So we have the harder part in place and working and it is fast enoguh.
80.000 characters are handled
Hi,
looking at:
-https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2206
-https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2221
I have the impression that the the f:viewParam/ and f:metadata/
are almost there, right ?
Exception is (only?) the ViewMetadataImpl.createMetadataView() ?
--
Matthias
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ORCHESTRA-40?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12706086#action_12706086
]
Manfred Geiler commented on ORCHESTRA-40:
-
The LOG.error should be replaced by a
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.org
Date: Tue, May 5, 2009 at 7:34 PM
Subject: FYI: javax.inject* standard ...
To: openwebbeans-...@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com
FYI:
the big failure of the JSR 299 is that it just lives in JavaEE land.
Best would have been to introduce a flexible DI API in SE land.
This could be extended in all the different profiles. So, 299 could
have just been a *consumer* of that flexible DI in order to extend
it and add the things that
That's true, but I think most JSR-299 impl can run outside JEE environment
already. Many specs started in EE and ended in SE 1 or 2 version of the SDK
later.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Matthias Wessendorf mat...@apache.orgwrote:
the big failure of the JSR 299 is that it just lives in
Add META-INF/services javax.faces.application.ApplicationFactory file
-
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-71
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-71
Project: MyFaces Portlet
Hi Blake,
the idea is to change the upload-config during runtime.
Not sure how moving it to trinidad-config helps to change it
via an Java API.
-Matthias
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Blake Sullivan
blake.sulli...@oracle.com wrote:
Matthias,
Would things be improved if we moved the
12 matches
Mail list logo