[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-1482) Facelets: cannot use facelets.VIEW_MAPPINGS with logical view handled by PageResolver

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-1482: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.12-core Assignee:

[jira] Updated: (TRINIDAD-1484) Change Trinidad metadata (build .xml files) to use jsr-276 metadata standard

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matthias Weßendorf updated TRINIDAD-1484: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.10-plugins

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1879) Problems with myfaces when java2 security is enabled

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12711977#action_12711977 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1879: - can you add this to myfaces

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1975) HtmlResponseStateManager.getSavedState() should handle javax.faces.ViewState=

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12711978#action_12711978 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1975: - can you add this to myfaces

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2007) Converters are not created properly when target class is both, an enum and implements an interface

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12711979#action_12711979 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2007: - can you add this to myfaces

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-2099) Detection of empty selection in UISelectOne through RenderUtils.NOTHING is faulty

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12711980#action_12711980 ] Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2099: - can you add this to myfaces

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1485) jsr 303 support for client-side validation

2009-05-22 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
jsr 303 support for client-side validation -- Key: TRINIDAD-1485 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1485 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: New Feature Reporter:

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1486) jsr 303 support for server-side validation

2009-05-22 Thread Gerhard Petracek (JIRA)
jsr 303 support for server-side validation -- Key: TRINIDAD-1486 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1486 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: New Feature Reporter:

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1879) Problems with myfaces when java2 security is enabled

2009-05-22 Thread Michael Concini (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712086#action_12712086 ] Michael Concini commented on MYFACES-1879: -- I can add it to the 2.0 stream.

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1487) Improve the application view cache

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
Improve the application view cache -- Key: TRINIDAD-1487 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1487 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Matthias Weßendorf

[Tobago] site deployment

2009-05-22 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hey Bernd, looking at MyFaces CORE, the deployed site is old. Looking at Trinidad, the site pretty old. Looking at Tobago, the site is fresh. Are you using the zone for the deployment ? -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions:

[VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))

2009-05-22 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
actually, I agree with Bernd. For the following layout: /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces_1_1_x /branches/myfaces_1_2_x Two reasons for way making 2.0 trunk: -most current development is on-going in 2.0 (new spec) -most commits are going to the 2.0 branch (so, let's make it trunk) So, I am +1 on

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1879) Problems with myfaces when java2 security is enabled

2009-05-22 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712201#action_12712201 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-1879: - I'll do an svn merge soon from 1.2 to

[ANNOUNCE] release of myfaces builder plugin 1.0.3

2009-05-22 Thread Leonardo Uribe
The Apache MyFaces team is pleased to announce the release of Apache MyFaces Builder Plugin and Annotations 1.0.3. Apache MyFaces Builder Plugin is a maven plugin, used internally in other projects like myfaces core and tomahawk for generate component classes, tag classes, faces-config files,

Re: [VOTE] SVN structure change (was: Re: [MyFaces CORE] SVN layout (was: Re: [source control] git and the ASF ...))

2009-05-22 Thread Bernd Bohmann
Hello, +1 I would prefer /trunk - 2.0 /branches/myfaces-1.1.x /branches/myfaces-1.2.x because we are not using cvs anymore and the path already contains http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/core/ maybe we can omit the 'myfaces' in the branch name. Regards Bernd On Fri, May 22, 2009

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1488) ChangeManager: Ability to apply component changes to a subtree

2009-05-22 Thread Andy Schwartz (JIRA)
ChangeManager: Ability to apply component changes to a subtree -- Key: TRINIDAD-1488 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1488 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type:

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-722) Javascript in Tomahawk components produces invalid markup when output as application/xhtml + xml with 1.2 RI

2009-05-22 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712282#action_12712282 ] Ramiro Pereira de Magalhães commented on TOMAHAWK-722: -- Wouldn't it

[jira] Created: (TRINIDAD-1489) get a valueChangeEvent for bigDecimal even though user didn't make a change.

2009-05-22 Thread Gabrielle Crawford (JIRA)
get a valueChangeEvent for bigDecimal even though user didn't make a change. Key: TRINIDAD-1489 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1489 Project: MyFaces

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-1489) get a valueChangeEvent for bigDecimal even though user didn't make a change.

2009-05-22 Thread Gabrielle Crawford (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712307#action_12712307 ] Gabrielle Crawford commented on TRINIDAD-1489: -- added a test case on

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TRINIDAD-1489) get a valueChangeEvent for bigDecimal even though user didn't make a change.

2009-05-22 Thread Gabrielle Crawford (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712307#action_12712307 ] Gabrielle Crawford edited comment on TRINIDAD-1489 at 5/22/09 4:33 PM:

[jira] Commented: (TRINIDAD-1489) get a valueChangeEvent for bigDecimal even though user didn't make a change.

2009-05-22 Thread Gabrielle Crawford (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712312#action_12712312 ] Gabrielle Crawford commented on TRINIDAD-1489: -- Currently there's this code

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TRINIDAD-1489) get a valueChangeEvent for bigDecimal even though user didn't make a change.

2009-05-22 Thread Gabrielle Crawford (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12712307#action_12712307 ] Gabrielle Crawford edited comment on TRINIDAD-1489 at 5/22/09 4:44 PM:

UIXEditableValue compareValues change

2009-05-22 Thread Gabrielle Crawford
Hi, I was planning on making a change to UIXEditableValue.compareValues. The details are here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1489 I don't think this is an issue, but since this is some really core code that's run for form controls I thought I'd see if anyone has objections.