[jira] Created: (EXTVAL-45) Richfaces ajax and RendererWrapper

Richfaces ajax and RendererWrapper -- Key: EXTVAL-45 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-45 Project: MyFaces Extensions Validator Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Stefan Meyer I

[jira] Created: (EXTVAL-47) Class based validation as in JSR 303

Class based validation as in JSR 303 Key: EXTVAL-47 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-47 Project: MyFaces Extensions Validator Issue Type: Wish Reporter: Stefan Meyer How is

[jira] Created: (EXTVAL-46) Referencing other properties for the skip validation strategy

Referencing other properties for the skip validation strategy - Key: EXTVAL-46 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL-46 Project: MyFaces Extensions Validator Issue

Re: Myfaces 2.0 PPR ResponseWriter impl

Pro elements, it is faster because you can ommit client side parsing! Mojarra probably does nothing currently in this regard! I am not sure how they are going to handle the embedded scripts case within a ppr request, because with the standard apis you cannot directly open an eval from a

Re: Myfaces 2.0 and javascript compression

The reason for now simply is that the official maven javascript plugin is alpha quality, as I could see while I was fixing everything on friday, it broke at least one namespace within the last two months. I did not dare to uncomment it, due to this fact, because it might have broken the build

Re: Myfaces 2.0 PPR ResponseWriter impl

Ok my personal guess is to move this discussion to the comments list for the jsf spec, I have not really found anything describing the correct behavior! Werner Werner Punz schrieb: Pro elements, it is faster because you can ommit client side parsing! Mojarra probably does nothing

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-1420) uploadThresholdSize seems to be ignored

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12717198#action_12717198 ] Jochen Reinhardt commented on TOMAHAWK-1420: Sorry for the late reply. I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Tobago 1.0.21

Hi, here is my +1 Regards Udo Bernd Bohmann schrieb: Hello, I would like to release Tobago 1.0.21 For a detail list please consult the release notes: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273styleName=Htmlversion=12313470 The version is available at the

Re: Myfaces 2.0 PPR ResponseWriter impl

Ok I have sent a mail regarding all this to the jcr-314 comments list, I hope this will trigger a discussion. Regarding our implementation, lets leave it client side and improve a little bit upon it (which means add script src= handling on the client, the javascript dynamic loading code is

[jira] Commented: (PORTLETBRIDGE-77) Add detection of Servlet API dependencies in JSF implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-77?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12717289#action_12717289 ] Neil Griffin commented on PORTLETBRIDGE-77: --- I too searched *.xml *.java

[jira] Created: (MYFACES-2241) Create a partial visit context, so that the partial response processes the correct components

Create a partial visit context, so that the partial response processes the correct components - Key: MYFACES-2241 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2241

[MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

All, I thought it might be a good time to raise the issue of solidifying a plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha release now that we've had a little time to work with the release candidate draft of the spec. What are the thoughts in the community with respect to what should be included in an alpha

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

Hey mike, I agree that we should try to get an *alpha* out of the door. Main mantra is: release often, release early q: what is the state on the facelets support, currently ? -Matthias On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Michael Concinimconc...@gmail.com wrote: All, I thought it might be a