+1 for JUL. Jan-Kees van Andel
2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger <mkien...@gmail.com>: > +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't > require any dependencies. > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith <work.gr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 java.util.logging.Logger >> >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini <mconc...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +1 for JUL >>> >>> Antonio Petrelli wrote: >>>> >>>> 2009/10/1 Werner Punz <werner.p...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Why don't you consider using SLF4J? >>>>>> Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try >>>>>> anyway :-D >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That would be a dependency replacement with another. >>>>> Just my personal opinion regarding SLF4J >>>>> >>>> >>>> Don't bother, I noticed that there is a bridge with which you can use >>>> JUL messages with SLF4J: >>>> http://www.slf4j.org/legacy.html >>>> For a "library" like MyFaces makes perfectly sense. >>>> >>>> Antonio >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Grant Smith >> >
