[jira] [Reopened] (MYFACES-3200) All values of self-defined composite-component attributes disappear unexpected.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rene O reopened MYFACES-3200: - The issue is still not solved entirely. With javax.faces.PARTIAL_STATE_SAVING set to false in web.xml, the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Extensions CDI (CODI) 1.0.0

+1 Best regards, Bart Kummel On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 05:00, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 7th release of Apache MyFaces Extensions CDI (aka MyFaces CODI) out. The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). The release

Re: [VOTE] Release of Extensions CDI (CODI) 1.0.0

+1 Am 03.07.11 05:00, schrieb Gerhard Petracek: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 7th release of Apache MyFaces Extensions CDI (aka MyFaces CODI) out. The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). The release contains the following modules: - CODI Core - CODI JSF Module

Re: [VOTE] how myfaces-commons-resourcehandler should work with suffix mapping enabled

I can agree with jacob that Suffix mapping is bad for resource-requests but the choosen option shouldn't block developers from using suffix mapping for pages. As far as I can understand the discussion - +1 for option 2 (option 3 if we want to have an advanced config version) Regards Rudy On 3

Re: [VOTE] Release of Extensions CDI (CODI) 1.0.0

+1 Regards, Jan-Kees 2011/7/4 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com +1 Am 03.07.11 05:00, schrieb Gerhard Petracek: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 7th release of Apache MyFaces Extensions CDI (aka MyFaces CODI) out. The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]). The

Re: [VOTE] how myfaces-commons-resourcehandler should work with suffix mapping enabled

+1 for option 3, but I'm not sure how much time it takes to implement this option. (If it's too much effort, option 2 looks okay to me) Regards, Jan-Kees 2011/7/4 Rudy De Busscher rdebussc...@gmail.com I can agree with jacob that Suffix mapping is bad for resource-requests but the choosen

[jira] [Commented] (EXTCDI-172) sub-groups for conversation groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13059357#comment-13059357 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on EXTCDI-172: - we could provide something like:

[jira] [Commented] (EXTCDI-172) sub-groups for conversation groups

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13059370#comment-13059370 ] Jakob Korherr commented on EXTCDI-172: -- sounds useful! sub-groups for conversation

Re: [jira] [Commented] (EXTCDI-172) sub-groups for conversation groups

Jepp makes a lot of sense Am 04.07.11 10:34, schrieb Gerhard Petracek (JIRA): [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13059357#comment-13059357 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on EXTCDI-172:

[jira] [Created] (MYFACES-3205) Create prototype for using shade-plugin to re-package and include shared into core

Create prototype for using shade-plugin to re-package and include shared into core -- Key: MYFACES-3205 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3205 Project:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Extensions CDI (CODI) 1.0.0

+1 Regards Rudy On 4 July 2011 10:02, Jan-Kees van Andel jankeesvanan...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Regards, Jan-Kees 2011/7/4 Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com +1 Am 03.07.11 05:00, schrieb Gerhard Petracek: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 7th release of Apache MyFaces

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3204) h:panelGrid sometimes renders invalid html

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13059422#comment-13059422 ] Martin Kočí commented on MYFACES-3204: -- Hi, what structure do you expect to render?

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3199) Handling AbortProcessingException is unconsistent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13059436#comment-13059436 ] Martin Kočí commented on MYFACES-3199: -- 2a) exception is instance of APE _or any

[jira] [Reopened] (TOBAGO-992) Move transition, target, focus of Tobago.submitAction to a set of optional options

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Udo Schnurpfeil reopened TOBAGO-992: Assignee: Udo Schnurpfeil (was: Bernd Bohmann) I've found some code part, which are not

Issues Upgrading JSF and Richfaces

Hello Everyone, I am trying to upgrade from (MyFaces 1.2 and RichFaces 3.3.2) to (MyFaces 2.1.1 and RichFaces 4.0.0). However, I am encountering the following stacktrace: SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet Faces Servlet threw exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:

[jira] [Resolved] (TOBAGO-992) Move transition, target, focus of Tobago.submitAction to a set of optional options

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Udo Schnurpfeil resolved TOBAGO-992. Resolution: Fixed Move transition, target, focus of Tobago.submitAction to a set of

[jira] [Created] (TOBAGO-1009) Action with transition=false doesn't work correcly with Firefox

Action with transition=false doesn't work correcly with Firefox --- Key: TOBAGO-1009 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOBAGO-1009 Project: MyFaces Tobago Issue Type: Bug

Re: Issues Upgrading JSF and Richfaces

Looks like you might either have remnants of Mojarra somewhere in your classpath or Richfaces depends on a Mojarra impl class: Sent from my iPhone On Jul 4, 2011, at 11:38 AM, David Wu wud...@hotmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I am trying to upgrade from (MyFaces 1.2 and RichFaces 3.3.2)