Re: [VOTE][core] fix for MYFACES-3586 (performance of resources in jar files served by ResourceHandlerImpl)

+1 I have had similar situations and people definitely need a fix this has higher priority than having no new config params. Werner Am 27.11.12 16:56, schrieb Leonardo Uribe: +1, if there are people with interest to get a problem solved, it's worth a shot to hear what people says and

Re: [VOTE][core] fix for MYFACES-3586 (performance of resources in jar files served by ResourceHandlerImpl)

The only _real_ solution is to not use the JSF specced resource handling and instead only use RESTful URLs. Since JSF resources may contain EL expressions, they are _not_ cacheable. We currently deliver them with a expiry of 14 days, but this is actually wrong! The RI has the same bug, so it's

[jira] [Created] (MYFACES-3657) 2.2 branch: checkstyle violation prevents compile

Werner Punz created MYFACES-3657: Summary: 2.2 branch: checkstyle violation prevents compile Key: MYFACES-3657 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3657 Project: MyFaces Core

[jira] [Resolved] (MYFACES-3657) 2.2 branch: checkstyle violation prevents compile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Werner Punz resolved MYFACES-3657. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2.0 2.2 branch: checkstyle violation prevents

Re: [VOTE][core] fix for MYFACES-3586 (performance of resources in jar files served by ResourceHandlerImpl)

Hi This vote is only for fix the performance problem over the default ResourceHandlerImpl bundled in MyFaces Core. The idea is create a temporal folder and uncompress the resources there. Also, adopt the idea of use a soft reference map to avoid read the file, but that memory cache needs some

[ANNOUNCE] Knee Deep in IT: Project Experiences with JSF 2.0, Javascript

Hello everyone, I'm pleased to announce a new article on JSFCentral.com about how a team at Sandia National Laboratories became highly productive using JSF to implement a complex UX design with minimal need for custom Javascript. This article walks through release cycles that transitioned a team

Re: Documentation

Hi Yes, it is something like that, but it requires some extra details 1. Define a local server to do the site:stage-deploy using scp (note the change in the pom.xml related to myfaces-local-staging) server idmyfaces-local-staging/id usernamemylocaluser/username

Re: Documentation

Hi The server entry goes into .m2/settings.xml regards, Leonardo 2012/11/28, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com: Hi Yes, it is something like that, but it requires some extra details 1. Define a local server to do the site:stage-deploy using scp (note the change in the pom.xml related to

Result (was: Re: [VOTE] Release of Extensions Validator 1.2.6 and 2.0.6)

thank you for voting! 3 binding +1 votes (pmc): - Grant Smith - Werner Punz - Gerhard Petracek 2 non-binding +1 votes: - Hazem Saleh - Thomas Andraschko no -1 votes regards, gerhard 2012/11/25 Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 6th

Re: Result (was: Re: [VOTE] Release of Extensions Validator 1.2.6 and 2.0.6)

count me in for another +1 ;) Sorry that I missed the eot, pretty busy around here... LieGrue, strub From: Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org To: dev@myfaces.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:49 PM Subject: Result (was: Re: [VOTE] Release

[jira] [Reopened] (TRINIDAD-2259) Serious problem with Facelets - launchDialog.xhtml from examples doesn't work as facelet - problem with partialSubmit=true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Max Starets reopened TRINIDAD-2259: --- Assignee: Max Starets Reopening this issue, since there are other problems with the

[jira] [Commented] (TRINIDAD-2259) Serious problem with Facelets - launchDialog.xhtml from examples doesn't work as facelet - problem with partialSubmit=true

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13505969#comment-13505969 ] Max Starets commented on TRINIDAD-2259: --- The