Hi Leo.
what are you trying to gain from this?
Here the criticism from the link you provided:
Criticism
Some publications do not recommend using object pooling with certain
languages, such as Java, especially for objects that only use memory and
hold no external
Hi all,
I am currently using MyFaces 2.1.8 but discovered an issue with composite
component renderFacet - and this issue started at version 2.1.4.
The following describes the problem:
I have a composite component called buttonSelectBox that uses
composite:renderFacet to inject content from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13536935#comment-13536935
]
dennis hoersch commented on MYFACES-3659:
-
I think in opposite to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek reopened EXTCDI-304:
-
CODI @ConversationScope + @Stateful in a bean = java.lang.StackOverflowError
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTCDI-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gerhard Petracek resolved EXTCDI-304.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
not a problem in codi, we just added a null check that we
Hi Martin
2012/12/20 Martin Marinschek mmarinsc...@apache.org:
Hi Leo.
what are you trying to gain from this?
Here the criticism from the link you provided:
Criticism
Some publications do not recommend using object pooling with certain
languages, such as Java, especially for objects
I agree with Werner.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not sure if it really makes sense to offload attributes into separate
tags unless they are common to more than one component.
Aka styleClass and style yes, currentDayCellClass etc... definitely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537157#comment-13537157
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3659:
-
DH I think in opposite to
Hi
It is probably a bug, just that it is hard to see it at first view. I
can't reproduce it,
but I found the change that create the problem:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3373
UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic
The problem is related to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537404#comment-13537404
]
dennis hoersch commented on MYFACES-3659:
-
With 'newly created resource
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537634#comment-13537634
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3659:
-
Yes, I'm aware of that. To be more
Anand V Nath created TRINIDAD-2350:
--
Summary: Add support for metadata tag in trinidad-skins schema for
skin and skin-addition
Key: TRINIDAD-2350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2350
Thanks Leonardo for the prompt response.
I did a test today by removing prependId=false from my form, but it does not
seem to fix the issue with v2.1.8.
One question - how can I re-open the JIRA ticket MYFACES-3373? I have
registered myself in JIRA but unable to re-open the issue which is
13 matches
Mail list logo