[jira] [Commented] (TRINIDAD-2349) TreeRenderer renders duplicate IDs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537757#comment-13537757 ] Daniel Niklas commented on TRINIDAD-2349: - This is the same issue as

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3659) Conditional include of scripts and stylesheets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537768#comment-13537768 ] dennis hoersch commented on MYFACES-3659: - Yes it works, thank you. I had to do

[jira] [Created] (TRINIDAD-2351) tr:tree is not skinable

Daniel Niklas created TRINIDAD-2351: --- Summary: tr:tree is not skinable Key: TRINIDAD-2351 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2351 Project: MyFaces Trinidad Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (TRINIDAD-2351) tr:tree is not skinable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daniel Niklas updated TRINIDAD-2351: Status: Patch Available (was: Open) tr:tree is not skinable

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TRINIDAD-2351) tr:tree is not skinable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13537812#comment-13537812 ] Daniel Niklas edited comment on TRINIDAD-2351 at 12/21/12 12:04 PM:

[jira] [Created] (MYFACES-3667) UIInput renders the old value after required validation error if field is empty

dennis hoersch created MYFACES-3667: --- Summary: UIInput renders the old value after required validation error if field is empty Key: MYFACES-3667 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3667

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3659) Conditional include of scripts and stylesheets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538156#comment-13538156 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3659: - Please note I'm working in trunk, so

[jira] [Created] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

Leonardo Uribe created MYFACES-3668: --- Summary: CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic Key: MYFACES-3668 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538187#comment-13538187 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3668: - It is probably a bug, just that it is

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538188#comment-13538188 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3668: - ZK I did a test today by removing

Re: MyFaces 2.1.8 - Issues with composite component renderFacet

Hi 2012/12/21 Zhao Koh zhao@gmail.com: Thanks Leonardo for the prompt response. I did a test today by removing prependId=false from my form, but it does not seem to fix the issue with v2.1.8. Strange. If that so, it could be caused by something different. I'm sure the implementation of

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538201#comment-13538201 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3668: - Committed fix, if there is no

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3659) Conditional include of scripts and stylesheets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538427#comment-13538427 ] dennis hoersch commented on MYFACES-3659: - Thank you so far. Yes I worked with

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3586) Performance improvement in Resource loading - HIGH CPU inflating bytes in ResourceHandlerImpl.handleResourceRequest

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538469#comment-13538469 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3586: - I have attached a patch (

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538480#comment-13538480 ] Zhao Koh commented on MYFACES-3668: --- Can re-produce using the attached files with

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538578#comment-13538578 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3668: - Thanks for the file, I can confirm

[jira] [Resolved] (MYFACES-3668) CLONE - UIForm.createUniqueId should take into account prependId logic

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe resolved MYFACES-3668. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.10) (was:

[jira] [Commented] (MYFACES-3664) JSF View Pooling (going beyond JSF Stateless Mode)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13538622#comment-13538622 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-3664: - Attached patch (

[ANNOUNCE] JSF and Java EE Newscast - Episode 12 - Dec 2012

Hello, I am pleased to announce a new episode of the JSF and Java EE Newscast on JSFCentral.com. The JSF and Java EE Newscast, hosted by Kito D. Mann, Ian Hlavats, and Daniel Hinojosa, is a monthly podcast that covers the latest headlines in the world of JavaServer Faces and Enterprise Java

Re: Making Tomahawk Calendar more WCAG (accessibility) compliant

Hi Werner, Now I am not sure which is better. Tag soup or attribute soup ;) Best regards, Martin Am 20.12.2012 um 08:37 schrieb Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com: I am not sure if it really makes sense to offload attributes into separate tags unless they are common to more than one