[Build-Tools] java packages

2007-12-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, should we always start with this package ? org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2 or org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven than -plugin.wagon -plugin.jdev -plugin.faces -plugin.javascript that would be similar to the maven-plugins, provided by the maven-folks; not really sure on maven vs

Re: [Build-Tools] java packages

2007-12-21 Thread Manfred Geiler
maven2 is ok I think at least it makes sure we have a namespace for incompatible maven3 plugins in the future... ;-) --Manfred On 12/21/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, should we always start with this package ? org.apache.myfaces.buildtools.maven2 or

Re: [Build-Tools] java packages

2007-12-21 Thread Andrew Robinson
+0.5 on maven I am a bit indifferent, but I think that a package should be version agnostic, and only be used for area of functionality. The JAR should be version specific. Don't you think that it would be invalid to import maven1 and maven2 jars at the same time? So I would see as the package: