[Fwd: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts]

2007-08-19 Thread simon
Forwarded Message From: simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:07:29 +0200 On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 12:47 +0200, Mario Ivankovits wrote: I briefly considered having an

[Fwd: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts]

2007-08-19 Thread simon
Forwarded Message From: simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 13:35:07 +0200 On Sat, 2007-08-18 at 10:19 +0200, simon wrote: The current implementation is for a Thread to be

[Fwd: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts]

2007-08-19 Thread simon
Forwarded Message From: simon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org Subject: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:44:19 +0200 Hi Adam, Thanks for your comments. Yes, hitchhiking on other requests would be great - if we

Re: [Fwd: Re: [orchestra] conversation timeouts]

2007-08-19 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi! One issue is that garbage collection only happens at some random time after the session is no longer used. So the timeout thread could end up calling into the ConversationManager even after the session has been explicitly removed. Possibly the ConversationManager could implement