Hi
Thanks to all people who vote
We have 4 +1
Grant Smith
Mark Struberg
Mike Kienenberger
Leonardo Uribe
so we can continue with the necessary steps to release MyFaces Core 2.1.9
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
This should be taken care of at this point for both 2.0.x and 2.1.x.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-3608
Because of all of the incomplete releases, I marked it as
resolved/not-closed against 2.1.9-snapshot, 2.0.15-snapshot. Hope
that was the right setting.
I'm not certain if we
Due to my lack of maven experience, it's taken me awhile to figure out
how to configure apache rat so that I could get past the two license
exceptions in the api project.
Here's the full list of unapproved files in the rest of the project:
And here's what I did to come up with this list:
mvn apache-rat:check -Drat.numUnapprovedLicenses=
ls -1 */target/rat.txt
api/target/rat.txt
bundle/target/rat.txt
implee6/target/rat.txt
impl/target/rat.txt
parent/target/rat.txt
shaded-impl/target/rat.txt
shared-public/target/rat.txt
Hi
Ok, good to know that. Maybe we can enable rat on the next release. I
think we can continue with the release vote too.
regards,
Leonardo
2012/9/13 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com:
And here's what I did to come up with this list:
mvn apache-rat:check -Drat.numUnapprovedLicenses=
I still have to vote -1 until we have fixed the licenses for all files
that need licenses. Licensing is one of the few absolute requirements
for an approved release.
I know that this vote is dying the death of a thousand cuts, but I am
doing the best I can to identify as many problems at once.
Hi
Do we require all licenses in place even for test files? I think the
related files does not require the license, because they are not code
at all. For example, the intention
META-INF/services/org.apache.myfaces.config.annotation.LifecycleProvider
is set the default lifecycle provider, so it
I am fairly certain we have to license our test source. I'm not sure
about test data, but it is probably easier to add a license than to
research the topic since there was only one data file.
Here's what I determined after looking at each file. I am out of time
for now, but I will try to add
Hi
I have updated the artifacts, so we can continue the vote. Please put
the vote on the mail with subject:
[VOTE] release of Apache MyFaces 2.1.9
[VOTE] release of Apache MyFaces 2.0.15
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2012/9/11 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi
It seems that one is the only
Leonardo,
Rat is still complaining about the same 7 licensing issues.
However, only certain instances of these files appear to be missing licenses.
myfaces-core-2.1.9-src find . -name _ExtLang.js -exec ls -1 {} \;
.This one has the license header. It comes from
myfaces-api-2.1.9-sources.jar
So I finally thought to look at the dates of the files inside of the
the Sep 10th myfaces-core-module-2.1.9-source-release.zip file.
They are all from
Sep 4th, so the problem does appear to be that this piece wasn't
rebuilt in your last release. This is probably why the license files
are still
Hi
It seems that one is the only artifact that does not have the update.
All other source files installed in nexus repository are ok. Maybe it
was because the assembly files were compiled before the final
sources-release.zip file, so the old one was used.
I'll rebuild everything everything again
Hi
I have fixed the files with missing licenses, included a fix for
MYFACES-3605, so I'll send another vote over the new artifacts soon.
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2012/9/7 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi
2012/9/7 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com:
[X] -1 for fatal flaws that should
[X] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released:
Looks like we have 5 files missing licensing information.
7 Unknown Licenses
***
Unapproved licenses:
The five files below appear to be missing any kind of licensing
information.The rest
Hi
2012/9/7 Mike Kienenberger mkien...@gmail.com:
[X] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released:
Looks like we have 5 files missing licensing information.
7 Unknown Licenses
***
Unapproved licenses:
The five files below appear to
So I'm doing the work to vote for a release -- something I haven't
participated in in a very long time.
Leonardo's key in KEYS - check
.jar.md5 matches - check
.jar.asc.md5 matches - check
.jar.sha1 matches -check
.jar.asc.sha1 matches -check
.asc files mat
Includes source - check
Source builds
Hi
This artifact:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-034/org/apache/myfaces/core/myfaces-core-module/2.1.9/myfaces-core-module-2.1.9-source-release.zip
is the one that allows to build it using maven. In practice, it is a
copy of the sources from the svn. This
Thanks! Not sure how I missed that one. Withdrawing my vote. I'll
let you know how it turns out.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
This artifact:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.1.9 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.1.7 [1]
2. Maven artifact group
+1
2012/9/5 Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.1.9 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared
+1
LieGrue,strub
- Original Message -
From: Leonardo Uribe lu4...@gmail.com
To: MyFaces Development dev@myfaces.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2012 6:27 PM
Subject: [VOTE] release of MyFaces Core 2.1.9
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.1.9
of MyFaces Core 2.1.9
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the 2.1.9 release of Apache
MyFaces core out.
The artifacts passed all TCK tests.
Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
1. Maven artifact group org.apache.myfaces.shared v4.1.7 [1]
2
22 matches
Mail list logo
