[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12446784
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Well that WAS handled by the previous implementation. Still, what didn't work
was when the Context was
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12446794
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-1383:
-
I take a look over weekend / monday!
FacesContextFactoryImpl issue using trinidad any myfaces core
Hi Craig,so you think it is better that we have another implementation of lifecyles for JSF portlets,(from scratch or using decoratore around current class) which can support both ActionRequest and RenderRequest and map them to different neccessary phases of JSF, one mapping for those who get
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12445431
]
Craig McClanahan commented on MYFACES-1383:
---
Looking at this issue again, it seems to me that it would be better to
recreate the FacesContext
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12445288
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Looking at this issue again, it seems to me that it would be better to recreate
the FacesContext between the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12439903
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Sorry it's taken so long for me to fix this issue. I'm hammered with Trinidad
issues at the moment. I looked
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12428845
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Hmmm. I don't know why it WOULD have to do this. I'll take a look at the
Portlet Bridge, but it seems to me
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12428849
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
Ok, this is not en entirely correct. The issue is that the current
FacesContext which is stored on the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1383?page=comments#action_12428850
]
Scott O'Bryan commented on MYFACES-1383:
I think I have a solution which I'll try to apply tomorrow. The portlet is
using the setExternalContext
