[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449615 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Yes, I got your point. Hope it works, I'll test it today. Thanx again, Mircea. valueChangeListener is being

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449348 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Ok, let me summarize, looks like some people do not read carefully :( 1. I tried calling renderResponse() from

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449356 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Now, please, let us try not to heat up this situation any more. We're all nice guys, stressed by our day

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449360 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Being given the gravity of the problem, I considered it's worth opening a JIRA issue. Looks like I'm the only

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449372 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1492: Hi Mircea, why shouldn't your getters be called if you call renderResponse? Of course they will be

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449377 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Martin, it looks like the not called getter is a known feature

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449379 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1492: Ah, now I know what you're talking about - you're talking about a dynamically bound value to an

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449381 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- They just aren't. Try it and see for yourself. Use my example above, no binding attributes in it. And I am

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449384 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1492: --- I too find its strange that they fire the event before the update_model phase ... I'll say thats the

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449390 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Well, you know, there is a JSF spec, we cant do anything which makes our implementation behave different

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449391 ] Martin Marinschek commented on MYFACES-1492: Hi Mircea, we're implementing a specification here - we cannot implement the basic

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449396 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- WOW. That didn't cross my mind :( In this case I owe appologies to everyone involved in this discussion,

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449414 ] Cagatay Civici commented on MYFACES-1492: - No problem:) By the way I've fixed the error in the doc. Mircea as a quick fix you may try the component

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449202 ] Cagatay Civici commented on MYFACES-1492: - This is the nature of the JSF lifecycle, try calling renderResponse of FacesContext to avoid the lifecycle

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449208 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- Already tryed that, the getters are not called because the view is not re-created. Anyway, this lifecycle is

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449211 ] Mircea Zahan commented on MYFACES-1492: --- The doc quote above was about the immediate attribute. valueChangeListener is being called before the setters,

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449218 ] Cagatay Civici commented on MYFACES-1492: - Well first of all please take it easy, you seem stressed a little bit:) I don't get what you mean by

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-1492) valueChangeListener is being called before the setters, even with immediate=true

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1492?page=comments#action_12449262 ] Mario Ivankovits commented on MYFACES-1492: --- I've never seen valueChangeEvents fired during the invoke application phase, and yes, I too think the